• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Radiotherapy: Impact on Departmental Waiting Times and Cost

    Author(s)
    Dwyer, P
    Hickey, B
    Burmeister, Elizabeth
    Burmeister, Bryan H.
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Burmeister, Elizabeth
    Year published
    2010
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Conventionally fractionated breast radiation therapy is delivered over 5-6 weeks. Randomised evidence has shown that hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy (HWBRT) over 3 weeks results in similar local control without increased toxicity. HWBRT is not standard practice in Australia for all eligible women. We examined the effect of using HWBRT (for eligible patients) on waiting lists and monetary costs. We identified factors associated with prescribing HWBRT. The Princess Alexandra Hospital Radiation Oncology Database was searched for all women with breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy in 2008. Included patients ...
    View more >
    Conventionally fractionated breast radiation therapy is delivered over 5-6 weeks. Randomised evidence has shown that hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy (HWBRT) over 3 weeks results in similar local control without increased toxicity. HWBRT is not standard practice in Australia for all eligible women. We examined the effect of using HWBRT (for eligible patients) on waiting lists and monetary costs. We identified factors associated with prescribing HWBRT. The Princess Alexandra Hospital Radiation Oncology Database was searched for all women with breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy in 2008. Included patients had undergone breast conserving surgery and had T1-2N0 tumours with negative margins. Women with large breasts and those receiving nodal irradiation were excluded. The outcome evaluated was fractionation schedule. Patient, tumour and treatment factors associated with the use of HWBRT were examined. The impact on departmental resources and health-care costs were calculated assuming the entire cohort received HWBRT. Two hundred seventy-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-seven (24%) of these patients were treated with HWBRT. Compared with the conventionally fractionated breast radiation therapy group, the HWBRT group were older (median 69 vs. 54 years; P < 0.001) and more likely to have smaller tumours (12 mm vs. 15 mm; P = 0.02). Had all eligible patients received HWBRT an extra 14 patients each month could be treated and health-care costs would be reduced by 24%. HWBRT was more frequently prescribed in older women with small tumours. More widespread use of HWBRT would allow significantly more patients to be treated each month with considerable cost savings.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
    Volume
    54
    Issue
    3
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02163.x
    Subject
    Nanotechnology not elsewhere classified
    Clinical Sciences
    Nursing
    Oncology and Carcinogenesis
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/38045
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E
    • TEQSA: PRV12076

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander