Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCasett, E.
dc.contributor.authorReus, J.C.
dc.contributor.authorStuginski-Barbosa, J.
dc.contributor.authorPorporatti, André Luís
dc.contributor.authorCarra, M.C.
dc.contributor.authorPeres, Marco Aurélio
dc.contributor.authorDe Luca Canto, Graziela
dc.contributor.authorManfredini, D.
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-21T03:41:41Z
dc.date.available2018-09-21T03:41:41Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1365-2842
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/joor.12520
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/380511
dc.description.abstractThis systematic review and meta‐analysis (MA) aimed to evaluate the diagnostic validity of questionnaires, clinical assessment and portable diagnostic devices compared to the reference standard method polysomnography (PSG) in assessing sleep bruxism (SB). Two reviewers searched electronic databases for diagnostic test accuracy studies that compared questionnaires, clinical assessment or portable diagnostic devices for SB, with the reference standard method PSG, comprising previous studies from all languages and with no restrictions regarding age, gender or time of publication. Of the 351 articles, eight met the inclusion criteria for qualitative, and seven for quantitative analysis. The methodology of selected studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS‐2). The studies were divided and analysed over three groups: three studies evaluating questionnaires, two regarding the clinical assessment of tooth wear and three covering portable diagnostic devices. The MA indicated that portable diagnostic devices showed the best validity of all evaluated methods, especially as far as a four‐channel EMG/ECG recording is concerned. Questionnaires and the clinical assessment can be used as screening methods to identify non‐SB individuals, although it is not that good in identifying subjects with SB. The quality of evidence identified through GRADEpro, was from very low‐to‐moderate, due to statistical heterogeneity between studies.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom722
dc.relation.ispartofpageto734
dc.relation.ispartofissue9
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
dc.relation.ispartofvolume44
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiomedical engineering
dc.subject.fieldofresearchDentistry
dc.subject.fieldofresearchDentistry not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4003
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode3203
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode320399
dc.titleValidity of different tools to assess sleep bruxism: a meta‐analysis
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorPeres, Marco A.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record