Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSanderson, Jayen_US
dc.contributor.authorWiseman, Leanneen_US
dc.contributor.authorPoncini, Samen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-29T12:38:04Z
dc.date.available2019-05-29T12:38:04Z
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.issn1839-745Xen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5130/ijrlp.1.2018.6043en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/380866
dc.description.abstractIn this article, we analyse agricultural data (ag-data) codes of practice. After the introduction, Part II examines the emergence of ag-data codes of practice and provides two case studies—the American Farm Bureau’s Privacy and Security Principles for Farm Data and New Zealand’s Farm Data Code of Practice—that illustrate that the ultimate aims of ag-data codes of practice are inextricably linked to consent, disclosure, transparency and, ultimately, the building of trust. Part III highlights the commonalities and challenges of ag-data codes of practice. In Part IV several concluding observations are made. Most notably, while ag-data codes of practice may help change practices and convert complex details about ag-data contracts into something tangible, understandable and useable, it is important for agricultural industries to not hastily or uncritically accept or adopt ag-data codes of practice. There needs to be clear objectives, and a clear direction in which stakeholders want to take ag-data practices. In other words, stakeholders need to be sure about what they are trying, and able, to achieve with ag-data codes of practice. Ag-data codes of practice need credible administration, accreditation and monitoring. There also needs to be a way of reviewing and evaluating the codes in a more meaningful way than simple metrics such as the number of members: for example, we need to know something about whether the codes raise awareness and education around data practices, and, perhaps most importantly, whether they encourage changes in attitudes and behaviours around the access to and use of ag-data.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherU T S ePRESSen_US
dc.publisher.placeAustraliaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto20en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Journal of Rural Law and Policyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume1en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchLaw not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode180199en_US
dc.titleWhat's behind the ag-data logo? An examination of voluntary agricultural data codes of practiceen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articlesen_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
gro.rights.copyright© 2018 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.en_US
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorWiseman, Leanne G.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record