Role conceptions, order transition and institutional balancing in the Asia-Pacific: a new theoretical framework
View/ Open
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
He, Kai
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2018
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The dawn of the twenty-first century witnessed a new wave of multilateral initiatives in the Asia-Pacific. By integrating institutional balancing theory and role theory, the author proposes a new theoretical framework—‘balance of roles’—to explain the variations in institutional strategies by different states. It is argued that a state’s role conception will shape its institutional balancing strategies in an order transition period. An order defender, like the USA, is more likely to adopt exclusive institutional balancing to exclude its target from its dominated institutions. An order challenger, such as China, will choose ...
View more >The dawn of the twenty-first century witnessed a new wave of multilateral initiatives in the Asia-Pacific. By integrating institutional balancing theory and role theory, the author proposes a new theoretical framework—‘balance of roles’—to explain the variations in institutional strategies by different states. It is argued that a state’s role conception will shape its institutional balancing strategies in an order transition period. An order defender, like the USA, is more likely to adopt exclusive institutional balancing to exclude its target from its dominated institutions. An order challenger, such as China, will choose both inclusive and exclusive institutional balancing to maximise its own power and legitimacy in a new international order. As a kingmaker, a proactive second-tier state is more likely to pick an inter-institutional balancing strategy to initiate new institutions for competing for influence with existing institutions. An institutionalised order transition might be more peaceful than widely perceived.
View less >
View more >The dawn of the twenty-first century witnessed a new wave of multilateral initiatives in the Asia-Pacific. By integrating institutional balancing theory and role theory, the author proposes a new theoretical framework—‘balance of roles’—to explain the variations in institutional strategies by different states. It is argued that a state’s role conception will shape its institutional balancing strategies in an order transition period. An order defender, like the USA, is more likely to adopt exclusive institutional balancing to exclude its target from its dominated institutions. An order challenger, such as China, will choose both inclusive and exclusive institutional balancing to maximise its own power and legitimacy in a new international order. As a kingmaker, a proactive second-tier state is more likely to pick an inter-institutional balancing strategy to initiate new institutions for competing for influence with existing institutions. An institutionalised order transition might be more peaceful than widely perceived.
View less >
Journal Title
Australian Journal of International Affairs
Volume
72
Issue
2
Funder(s)
ARC
Grant identifier(s)
FT160100355
Copyright Statement
This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in the Australian Journal of International Affairs, 72 (2), pp. 92-109, 01 Mar 2018, copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2018.1437390
Subject
Policy and administration
Policy and administration not elsewhere classified
Political science
Institutional balancing
Order transition
Role conceptions
Role theory
US–China relations