Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHale, Robinen_US
dc.contributor.authorColeman, Rhysen_US
dc.contributor.authorSievers, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Timothyen_US
dc.contributor.authorSwearer, Stephenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-06T01:33:17Z
dc.date.available2019-06-06T01:33:17Z
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.issn2150-8925en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ecs2.2381en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/382025
dc.description.abstractUrban stormwater treatment wetlands are constructed to treat stormwater runoff before it enters waterways, but are often inhabited by animals that can suffer impairments. Such effects will be exacerbated if animals mistakenly prefer sites where their fitness is reduced, and are caught in ecological traps. Traps can compromise the persistence of threatened species in urban landscapes, so assessing how animals respond to stormwater wetlands, and whether their fitness varies between stormwater and natural wetlands, can guide management efforts. We examined the habitat selection behavior of dwarf galaxias (Galaxiella pusilla), a threatened freshwater fish inhabiting wetlands and streams around Melbourne, Australia. We tested whether fish respond to cues that could indicate habitat quality, and whether they can differentiate between water from stormwater and non‐stormwater wetlands. We also tested whether fitness (e.g., survival, development) was lower at stormwater wetlands. Fish responded weakly to cues and did not avoid stormwater wetlands. Survival was lower at stormwater wetlands, and fish suffered delayed ovarian maturation, potentially due to a lack of food. Thus, stormwater wetlands can be equal‐preference ecological traps for G. pusilla, a key finding with direct implications for conservation. For highly dispersive species that are not selective about habitats, managing ecological traps requires a whole‐of‐landscape approach, with consideration given to where wetlands are constructed. Given the investment required to remediate existing ecological traps, this approach can also identify priority wetlands for intervention. We discuss our results in the context of how insights from animal behavior can inform threatened species conservation in fragmented urban landscapes.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto13en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue8en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEcosphereen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume9en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchFreshwater Ecologyen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEnvironmental Managementen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEcological Applicationsen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode060204en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode050205en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode0501en_US
dc.titleUsing conservation behavior to manage ecological traps for a threatened freshwater fishen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articlesen_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
dcterms.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
gro.rights.copyright© 2018 Hale, Robin, et. al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en_US
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record