Antibiotics for prolonged wet cough in children

View/ Open
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Marchant, Julie M
Petsky, Helen L
Morris, Peter S
Chang, Anne B
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2018
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background:
Cough is a frequent symptom presenting to doctors. Themost common cause of childhood chronic (greater than fours weeks’ duration)
wet cough is protracted bacterial bronchitis (PBB) in some settings, although othermore serious causes can also present this way. Timely
and effective management of chronic wet or productive cough improves quality of life and clinical outcomes. Current international
guidelines suggest a course of antibiotics is the first treatment of choice in the absence of signs or symptoms specific to an alternative
diagnosis. This review sought to clarify the current evidence to support this ...
View more >Background: Cough is a frequent symptom presenting to doctors. Themost common cause of childhood chronic (greater than fours weeks’ duration) wet cough is protracted bacterial bronchitis (PBB) in some settings, although othermore serious causes can also present this way. Timely and effective management of chronic wet or productive cough improves quality of life and clinical outcomes. Current international guidelines suggest a course of antibiotics is the first treatment of choice in the absence of signs or symptoms specific to an alternative diagnosis. This review sought to clarify the current evidence to support this recommendation. Objectives: To determine the efficacy of antibiotics in treating children with prolonged wet cough (excluding children with bronchiectasis or other known underlying respiratory illness) and to assess risk of harm due to adverse events. Search methods: We undertook an updated search (from 2008 onwards) using the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, trials registries, review articles and reference lists of relevant articles. The latest searches were performed in September 2017. Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antibiotics with a placebo or a control group in children with chronic wet cough. We excluded cluster and cross-over trials. Data collection and analysis: We used standard methods as recommended by Cochrane.We reviewed results of searches against predetermined criteria for inclusion. Two independent review authors selected, extracted and assessed the data for inclusion. We contacted authors of eligible studies for further information as needed. We analysed data as ’intention to treat.’
View less >
View more >Background: Cough is a frequent symptom presenting to doctors. Themost common cause of childhood chronic (greater than fours weeks’ duration) wet cough is protracted bacterial bronchitis (PBB) in some settings, although othermore serious causes can also present this way. Timely and effective management of chronic wet or productive cough improves quality of life and clinical outcomes. Current international guidelines suggest a course of antibiotics is the first treatment of choice in the absence of signs or symptoms specific to an alternative diagnosis. This review sought to clarify the current evidence to support this recommendation. Objectives: To determine the efficacy of antibiotics in treating children with prolonged wet cough (excluding children with bronchiectasis or other known underlying respiratory illness) and to assess risk of harm due to adverse events. Search methods: We undertook an updated search (from 2008 onwards) using the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, trials registries, review articles and reference lists of relevant articles. The latest searches were performed in September 2017. Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antibiotics with a placebo or a control group in children with chronic wet cough. We excluded cluster and cross-over trials. Data collection and analysis: We used standard methods as recommended by Cochrane.We reviewed results of searches against predetermined criteria for inclusion. Two independent review authors selected, extracted and assessed the data for inclusion. We contacted authors of eligible studies for further information as needed. We analysed data as ’intention to treat.’
View less >
Journal Title
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Volume
2018
Issue
7
Copyright Statement
© 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd. This review is published as a Cochrane Review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018, 7. Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews should be consulted for the most recent version of the Review.
Subject
Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified
Medical and Health Sciences
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences