Pretreatment risk stratification of feeding tube use in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer
Author(s)
Anderson, Nigel J
Jackson, James E
Smith, Jennifer G
Wada, Morikatsu
Schneider, Michal
Poulsen, Michael
Rolfo, Maureen
Fahandej, Maziar
Gan, Hui
Joon, Daryl Lim
Khoo, Vincent
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2018
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background:
The purpose of this study was to establish a risk stratification model for feeding tube use in patients who undergo intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancers.
Methods:
One hundred thirty‐nine patients treated with definitive IMRT (+/‐ concurrent chemotherapy) for head and neck mucosal cancers were included in this study. Patients were recommended a prophylactic feeding tube and followed up by a dietician for at least 8 weeks postradiotherapy (post‐RT). Potential prognostic factors were analyzed for risk and duration of feeding tube use for at least 25% of dietary requirements.
Results:
Many ...
View more >Background: The purpose of this study was to establish a risk stratification model for feeding tube use in patients who undergo intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancers. Methods: One hundred thirty‐nine patients treated with definitive IMRT (+/‐ concurrent chemotherapy) for head and neck mucosal cancers were included in this study. Patients were recommended a prophylactic feeding tube and followed up by a dietician for at least 8 weeks postradiotherapy (post‐RT). Potential prognostic factors were analyzed for risk and duration of feeding tube use for at least 25% of dietary requirements. Results: Many variables had significant effects on risk and/or duration of feeding tube use in univariate analyses. Subsequent multivariable analysis showed that T classification ≥3 and level 2 lymphadenopathy were the best independent significant predictors of higher risk and duration of feeding tube use, respectively, in oral cavity, pharyngeal, and supraglottic primaries. Conclusion: In patients treated with definitive IMRT, T classification ≥3 and level 2 lymphadenopathy can potentially stratify patients into 4 risk groups for developing severe dysphagia requiring feeding tube use.
View less >
View more >Background: The purpose of this study was to establish a risk stratification model for feeding tube use in patients who undergo intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancers. Methods: One hundred thirty‐nine patients treated with definitive IMRT (+/‐ concurrent chemotherapy) for head and neck mucosal cancers were included in this study. Patients were recommended a prophylactic feeding tube and followed up by a dietician for at least 8 weeks postradiotherapy (post‐RT). Potential prognostic factors were analyzed for risk and duration of feeding tube use for at least 25% of dietary requirements. Results: Many variables had significant effects on risk and/or duration of feeding tube use in univariate analyses. Subsequent multivariable analysis showed that T classification ≥3 and level 2 lymphadenopathy were the best independent significant predictors of higher risk and duration of feeding tube use, respectively, in oral cavity, pharyngeal, and supraglottic primaries. Conclusion: In patients treated with definitive IMRT, T classification ≥3 and level 2 lymphadenopathy can potentially stratify patients into 4 risk groups for developing severe dysphagia requiring feeding tube use.
View less >
Journal Title
Head and Neck
Volume
40
Issue
10
Subject
Clinical sciences
Clinical sciences not elsewhere classified
Dentistry