Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGarnett, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorButchart, Stuarten_US
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorBayraktarov, Elisaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBuchanan, Katherineen_US
dc.contributor.authorBurbidge, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorChauvenet, Alienoren_US
dc.contributor.authorChristidis, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorEhmke, Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorGrace, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorHoccom, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorLegge, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeiper, Ien_US
dc.contributor.authorLindenmayer, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authoret al.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-18T12:32:14Z
dc.date.available2019-06-18T12:32:14Z
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.issn0888-8892en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cobi.13220en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/382272
dc.description.abstractAlthough evidence‐based approaches have become commonplace for determining the success of conservation measures for the management of threatened taxa, there are no standard metrics for assessing progress in research or management. We developed 5 metrics to meet this need for threatened taxa and to quantify the need for further action and effective alleviation of threats. These metrics (research need, research achievement, management need, management achievement, and percent threat reduction) can be aggregated to examine trends for an individual taxon or for threats across multiple taxa. We tested the utility of these metrics by applying them to Australian threatened birds, which appears to be the first time that progress in research and management of threats has been assessed for all threatened taxa in a faunal group at a continental scale. Some research has been conducted on nearly three‐quarters of known threats to taxa, and there is a clear understanding of how to alleviate nearly half of the threats with the highest impact. Some management has been attempted on nearly half the threats. Management outcomes ranged from successful trials to complete mitigation of the threat, including for one‐third of high‐impact threats. Progress in both research and management tended to be greater for taxa that were monitored or occurred on oceanic islands. Predation by cats had the highest potential threat score. However, there has been some success reducing the impact of cat predation, so climate change (particularly drought), now poses the greatest threat to Australian threatened birds. Our results demonstrate the potential for the proposed metrics to encapsulate the major trends in research and management of both threats and threatened taxa and provide a basis for international comparisons of evidence‐based conservation science.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishingen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto13en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalConservation Biologyen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiological Sciences not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEnvironmental Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiological Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode069999en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode05en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode06en_US
dc.titleMetrics of progress in the understanding and management of threats to Australian birdsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articlesen_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version.en_US
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record