• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Book chapters
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Book chapters
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Co-producing prosecution: old and new third party forms

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    HolderPUB7301.pdf (121.8Kb)
    File version
    Submitted Manuscript (SM)
    Author(s)
    Holder, R
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Holder, Robyn L.
    Year published
    2018
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Third parties have become stalwarts of regulatory systems and as subjects in regulatory studies, yet definitions and analysis are often 'state-centric'. This chapter is inspired by Peter Grabosky's invitation to look beyond this instrumental focus and beyond that which is sponsored by the state. It shares his interest in exploring the 'democratisation' of regulatory activity, and whether third parties always act in the interests of the regulator or state. Grabosky's scholarly curiosity has seen him take a long view on case studies and in forecasting trends. Focusing on the under-examined domain of the public prosecutor, the ...
    View more >
    Third parties have become stalwarts of regulatory systems and as subjects in regulatory studies, yet definitions and analysis are often 'state-centric'. This chapter is inspired by Peter Grabosky's invitation to look beyond this instrumental focus and beyond that which is sponsored by the state. It shares his interest in exploring the 'democratisation' of regulatory activity, and whether third parties always act in the interests of the regulator or state. Grabosky's scholarly curiosity has seen him take a long view on case studies and in forecasting trends. Focusing on the under-examined domain of the public prosecutor, the chapter finds evidence of different third party forms, blended regulatory strategies adopted by them and deep normative motivation to their engagement with and in prosecution. It looks beyond the centre to explore third parties as legal, social and political actors energised by a meld of private and public interests.
    View less >
    Book Title
    Criminal Justice and Regulation Revisited: Essays in Honour of Peter Grabosky
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315174044-5
    Copyright Statement
    © 2018 Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in Criminal Justice and Regulation Revisited: Essays in Honour of Peter Grabosky on 8 May 2018, available online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315174044
    Subject
    Criminology not elsewhere classified
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/382338
    Collection
    • Book chapters

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E
    • TEQSA: PRV12076

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander