Using eye-tracking to study designers' cognitive behaviour when designing with CAAD

View/ Open
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Yu, Rongrong
Gero, John S.
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2018
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This paper presents a case study exploring the eye-movement of two architecture master students while using a CAAD tool. The students completed an architectural design task using CAAD software in a 60 minute design session. The “Think aloud” method was used to collect cognitive data while their eye movements were captured using eye-tracking equipment. The session was segmented and coded for visual location. Results of this exploratory study indicate differences when using a CAAD tool when designing compared to visual scanning of existing objects. These results, if generalizable, imply that CAAD software development should ...
View more >This paper presents a case study exploring the eye-movement of two architecture master students while using a CAAD tool. The students completed an architectural design task using CAAD software in a 60 minute design session. The “Think aloud” method was used to collect cognitive data while their eye movements were captured using eye-tracking equipment. The session was segmented and coded for visual location. Results of this exploratory study indicate differences when using a CAAD tool when designing compared to visual scanning of existing objects. These results, if generalizable, imply that CAAD software development should focus on space making as well as on object boundaries.
View less >
View more >This paper presents a case study exploring the eye-movement of two architecture master students while using a CAAD tool. The students completed an architectural design task using CAAD software in a 60 minute design session. The “Think aloud” method was used to collect cognitive data while their eye movements were captured using eye-tracking equipment. The session was segmented and coded for visual location. Results of this exploratory study indicate differences when using a CAAD tool when designing compared to visual scanning of existing objects. These results, if generalizable, imply that CAAD software development should focus on space making as well as on object boundaries.
View less >
Conference Title
52nd International Conference of the Architectural Science Association 2018
Publisher URI
Copyright Statement
© 2018 The Architectural Science Association. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this conference please refer to the conference’s website or contact the author(s).
Subject
Design History and Theory