• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Evaluating alternative methods of asset pricing based on the overall magnitude of pricing errors

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Li211051.pdf (405.4Kb)
    File version
    Accepted Manuscript (AM)
    Author(s)
    Shi, Qi
    Li, Bin
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Li, Bin
    Year published
    2019
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    We are the first pioneers who evaluate the overall fitness of the two-pass Fama–MacBeth regression and the generalized method of moments (GMM) by comparing the R 2 or mean absolute pricing error (MAE), using a Monte Carlo simulation of different models and portfolios for hundreds of trials and, in particular, focusing on the case that the expected return is always a gross return in both methods. Our findings reveal an innovative finding that both methodologies achieve approximate overall magnitudes of pricing errors.We are the first pioneers who evaluate the overall fitness of the two-pass Fama–MacBeth regression and the generalized method of moments (GMM) by comparing the R 2 or mean absolute pricing error (MAE), using a Monte Carlo simulation of different models and portfolios for hundreds of trials and, in particular, focusing on the case that the expected return is always a gross return in both methods. Our findings reveal an innovative finding that both methodologies achieve approximate overall magnitudes of pricing errors.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    Finance Research Letters
    Volume
    29
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.005
    Copyright Statement
    © 2019 Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, providing that the work is properly cited.
    Subject
    Banking, finance and investment
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/384125
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E
    • TEQSA: PRV12076

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander