Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavies, KM
dc.contributor.authorCoombes, ID
dc.contributor.authorKeogh, S
dc.contributor.authorHay, K
dc.contributor.authorHurst, C
dc.contributor.authorWhitfield, KM
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-06T12:31:41Z
dc.date.available2019-07-06T12:31:41Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1876-1399
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecns.2019.03.010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/385061
dc.description.abstractBackground: Incorrect medication administration risks errors and patient harm. The aim of this study was to test the reliability of the newly developed medication administration evaluation and feedback tool. Methods: An observational, fully crossed design using recorded scenarios in a simulated environment was used to test reliability and agreement of an evaluation tool for nurses administering medications. Results: Intrarater and inter-rater reliability observed agreement overall were 84% and 82% with Fleiss Kappa coefficient 0.72 and 0.68, respectively. Overall intrarater and inter-rater reliability of the tool rated as good. Conclusions: The medication administration evaluation and feedback tool is reliable in a simulated environment.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1
dc.relation.ispartofpageto7
dc.relation.ispartofjournalClinical Simulation in Nursing
dc.relation.ispartofvolume32
dc.subject.fieldofresearchNursing
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4205
dc.titleMedication Administration Evaluation and Feedback Tool: Simulation Reliability Testing
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorKeogh, Samantha J.
gro.griffith.authorHurst, Cameron P.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record