Lifetime risk of prostate cancer overdiagnosis in Australia: quantifying the risk of overdiagnosis associated with prostate cancer screening in Australia using a novel lifetime risk approach.
View/ Open
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Pathirana, Thanya
Hayen, Andrew
Doust, Jenny
Glasziou, Paul
Bell, Katy
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2019
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To quantify the risk of overdiagnosis associated with prostate cancer screening in Australia using a novel lifetime risk approach. DESIGN: Modelling and validation of the lifetime risk method using publicly available population data. SETTING: Opportunistic screening for prostate cancer in the Australian population. PARTICIPANTS: Australian male population (1982-2012). INTERVENTIONS: Prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer screening. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: lifetime risk of overdiagnosis in 2012 (excess lifetime cancer risk adjusted for changing competing mortality); Secondary: ...
View more >OBJECTIVES: To quantify the risk of overdiagnosis associated with prostate cancer screening in Australia using a novel lifetime risk approach. DESIGN: Modelling and validation of the lifetime risk method using publicly available population data. SETTING: Opportunistic screening for prostate cancer in the Australian population. PARTICIPANTS: Australian male population (1982-2012). INTERVENTIONS: Prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer screening. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: lifetime risk of overdiagnosis in 2012 (excess lifetime cancer risk adjusted for changing competing mortality); Secondary: lifetime risk of prostate cancer diagnosis (unadjusted and adjusted for competing mortality); Excess lifetime risk of prostate cancer diagnosis (for all years subsequent to 1982). RESULTS: The lifetime risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer increased from 6.1% in 1982 (1 in 17) to 19.6% in 2012 (1 in 5). Using 2012 competing mortality rates, the lifetime risk in 1982 was 11.5% (95% CI 11.0% to 12.0%). The excess lifetime risk of prostate cancer in 2012 (adjusted for changing competing mortality) was 8.2% (95% CI 7.6% to 8.7%) (1 in 13). This corresponds to 41% of prostate cancers being overdiagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: Our estimated rate of overdiagnosis is in agreement with estimates using other methods. This method may be used without the need to adjust for lead times. If annual (cross-sectional) data are used, then it may give valid estimates of overdiagnosis once screening has been established long enough for the benefits from the early detection of non-overdiagnosed cancer at a younger age to be realised in older age groups.
View less >
View more >OBJECTIVES: To quantify the risk of overdiagnosis associated with prostate cancer screening in Australia using a novel lifetime risk approach. DESIGN: Modelling and validation of the lifetime risk method using publicly available population data. SETTING: Opportunistic screening for prostate cancer in the Australian population. PARTICIPANTS: Australian male population (1982-2012). INTERVENTIONS: Prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer screening. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: lifetime risk of overdiagnosis in 2012 (excess lifetime cancer risk adjusted for changing competing mortality); Secondary: lifetime risk of prostate cancer diagnosis (unadjusted and adjusted for competing mortality); Excess lifetime risk of prostate cancer diagnosis (for all years subsequent to 1982). RESULTS: The lifetime risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer increased from 6.1% in 1982 (1 in 17) to 19.6% in 2012 (1 in 5). Using 2012 competing mortality rates, the lifetime risk in 1982 was 11.5% (95% CI 11.0% to 12.0%). The excess lifetime risk of prostate cancer in 2012 (adjusted for changing competing mortality) was 8.2% (95% CI 7.6% to 8.7%) (1 in 13). This corresponds to 41% of prostate cancers being overdiagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: Our estimated rate of overdiagnosis is in agreement with estimates using other methods. This method may be used without the need to adjust for lead times. If annual (cross-sectional) data are used, then it may give valid estimates of overdiagnosis once screening has been established long enough for the benefits from the early detection of non-overdiagnosed cancer at a younger age to be realised in older age groups.
View less >
Journal Title
BMJ Open
Volume
9
Issue
3
Copyright Statement
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Subject
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Health services and systems
Public health
Other health sciences