Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrough, Paula
dc.contributor.authorBoase, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-15T00:14:22Z
dc.date.available2019-07-15T00:14:22Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0004-9530
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajpy.12244
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/386300
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Despite regularly reporting high levels of occupational stress, lawyers are an under-researched group in this field. The first objective of this research is to develop a short measure assessing two common work stress management techniques (WSMS) commonly employed by lawyers: relaxation and cognitive restructuring. A second objective is to assess the impact of three key job characteristics and two work stress management techniques upon levels of psychological strain, job satisfaction, and work engagement in a sample of lawyers. Method: Drawing on the Job Demands Control-Support theoretical explanation of occupational stress, we assessed the impact of the two stress management techniques upon three key psychological outcomes, in comparison with three common job characteristics. An anonymous survey was administered to lawyers employed in one Australian state and produced a respondent sample of N = 114. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis produced acceptable psychometric results for the six-item WSMS. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses indicated that job demands was not directly associated with any of the three criterion variables. Importantly, cognitive restructuring was as strongly associated with job satisfaction and work engagement, compared to the three job characteristics. Cognitive restructuring techniques were also associated with high levels of work engagement even when experiencing high job demands. Conclusions: The implications for occupational stress experienced by lawyers, the current popularity of occupational resilience and organisational wellness programs, and the assessment of generic job characteristics are all discussed.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAustralian Journal of Psychology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCognitive and computational psychology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode52
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode5204
dc.titleOccupational stress management in the legal profession: Development, validation, and assessment of a stress-management instrument
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscript (AM)
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version.
gro.rights.copyright© 2019 Australian Psychological Society. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Occupational stress management in the legal profession: Development, validation, and assessment of a stress-management instrument, Australian Journal of Psychology, which has been published in final form at 10.1111/ajpy.12244. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving (http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-828039.html)
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorBrough, Paula


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record