Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLakhani, Ali
dc.contributor.authorZeeman, Heidi
dc.contributor.authorWright, Courtney J
dc.contributor.authorWatling, David P
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Dianne
dc.contributor.authorIslam, Rafikul
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-02T01:13:38Z
dc.date.available2019-09-02T01:13:38Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1057-9214
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mcda.1689
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/386836
dc.description.abstractThe lack of inclusive, accessible housing that meets the needs of people with physical and cognitive disability is a global issue. The inadequacy of inclusive housing development is partly a result of divergent priorities and poor coordination between housing, health, and disability sector stakeholders—public and private developers, designers, architects, occupational therapists, and disability service organizations. This paper provides findings from an Australian Research Council funded study where the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was utilized to compare and contrast inclusive housing development priorities among relevant stakeholders. A multistage process was undertaken to ascertain the AHP criteria for inclusive housing development decisions, including a systematic review of peer‐reviewed and grey literature, in addition to a structured focus group with end users (n = 17) and an industry stakeholder online survey (n = 130). Finally, a subgroup of industry stakeholders (n = 29) representing the housing, health, and disability sectors completed the AHP to establish decision priorities. The final AHP model indicated three broad clusters of decision priorities for inclusive accessible housing development: end‐user connectedness, building considerations, and feasibility, respectively. Global weights conclude that specific end‐user connectedness elements, namely, “access to health care,” “community engagement,” “proximity to transport,” and “security and safety,” were the foremost priorities. It is expected that inclusive housing development decisions that integrate the connectedness of end users first and foremost, with building and feasibility priorities, will favourably impact the housing opportunities and choices for people with disability.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1
dc.relation.ispartofpageto15
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBusiness and Management
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1503
dc.subject.keywordsSocial Sciences
dc.subject.keywordsManagement
dc.subject.keywordsBusiness & Economics
dc.subject.keywordsinclusive housing
dc.subject.keywordsANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
dc.titleStakeholder priorities for inclusive accessible housing: A systematic review and multicriteria decision analysis
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLakhani, A; Zeeman, H; Wright, CJ; Watling, DP; Smith, D; Islam, R, Stakeholder priorities for inclusive accessible housing: A systematic review and multicriteria decision analysis, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2019, pp. 1-15
dc.date.updated2019-09-02T00:33:23Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorZeeman, Heidi
gro.griffith.authorWatling, David P.
gro.griffith.authorLakhani, Ali M.
gro.griffith.authorWright, Courtney J.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record