dc.contributor.author | Daly, Kathleen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-03T05:30:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-03T05:30:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1990 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1043-1578 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/386913 | |
dc.description.abstract | For close to a decade I have been reading work by feminist
law scholars to learn two things: How does the law treat women and
gender difference? How do feminists think the law should treat
women and gender difference? In this essay, my remarks do not do justice to
the many feminist analyses of law.1 Instead I consider themes that unfolded
during the 1980s around the meanings of "equality" in light of differences
between men and women, as well as among them. Although I draw mostly
from work by U.S. feminists, I will also include work by Canadian, Australian,
and British feminists. My aim is to make sense of feminist legal analyses from
a non-lawyer perspective, and my reason for doing so is straightforward: those
of us working in the sociology of law, crime, and justice cannot ignore this
body of work. At the same time, we have something to contribute to it,
namely, our theories and research on how gender relations organize social life
and social institutions. | |
dc.publisher | Social Justice | |
dc.publisher.uri | http://www.socialjusticejournal.org/fliers/17-3flier.html | |
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom | 7 | |
dc.relation.ispartofpageto | 24 | |
dc.relation.ispartofissue | 3 | |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Social Justice | |
dc.relation.ispartofvolume | 17 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Criminology | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 4402 | |
dc.title | Reflections on feminist legal thought | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Daly, K, Reflections on feminist legal thought, Social Justice, 1990, 17 (3), pp. 7-24 | |
dc.date.updated | 2019-09-03T03:22:00Z | |
gro.hasfulltext | No Full Text | |
gro.griffith.author | Daly, Kathleen | |