Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWortley, Richard
dc.contributor.authorLeclerc, Benoit
dc.contributor.authorReynald, Danielle M
dc.contributor.authorSmallbone, Stephen
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-11T22:54:52Z
dc.date.available2019-09-11T22:54:52Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0886-2605
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0886260519869235
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/387226
dc.description.abstractThis study examined the role of the reaction of the victim, the nature of the physical setting, and the proximity of third parties in deterring offenders from completing an act of child sexual abuse (CSA). A self-report study was conducted with 238 adult males serving a custodial sentence for CSA, of whom 82 identified an occasion in which they had tried to have sexual contact with a child but did not because they were stopped or discouraged. We examined the situational characteristics of the noncompleted offense and compared these with the most recent completed offense by the same offenders. The most common reason for stopping the noncompleted offense, given by more than half of the participants, was the negative reaction of the child, and in particular, the direct request by the child to stop. Actual or potential actions by third parties were the next most cited reasons, with around a quarter of cases stopped because the offender was interrupted. In comparison to the noncomplete offense, in the completed offense the child was more likely to be younger and to be perceived as a willing participant. The most common suggestion for what might have stopped the completed offense, endorsed almost universally, was a negative reaction from the child. Factors that increased the chance of being detected—someone being nearby and the possibility of being observed—were also strongly endorsed. We argue that the findings provide the basis for devising offense-focused prevention strategies for CSA.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom4303
dc.relation.ispartofpageto4327
dc.relation.ispartofissue20
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Interpersonal Violence
dc.relation.ispartofvolume34
dc.relation.urihttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/DP130100501
dc.relation.grantIDDP130100501
dc.relation.fundersARC
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCriminology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSocial Work
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1602
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1607
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1701
dc.subject.keywordsbystander intervention
dc.subject.keywordschild safety programs
dc.subject.keywordschild sexual abuse
dc.subject.keywordsoffender self-report
dc.subject.keywordssituational crime prevention
dc.titleWhat Deters Child Sex Offenders? A Comparison Between Completed and Noncompleted Offenses
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWortley, R; Leclerc, B; Reynald, DM; Smallbone, S, What Deters Child Sex Offenders? A Comparison Between Completed and Noncompleted Offenses., Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2019, 34 (20), pp. 4303-4327
dc.date.updated2019-09-11T22:36:53Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorLeclerc, Benoit
gro.griffith.authorReynald, Danielle M.
gro.griffith.authorSmallbone, Stephen W.
gro.griffith.authorWortley, Richard K.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record