• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Do insertional and mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy display different material properties?

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Coombes159645.pdf (580.3Kb)
    File version
    Accepted Manuscript (AM)
    Author(s)
    Coombes, Brooke
    Tucker, Kylie
    Vicenzino, Bill
    Vuvan, Viana
    Mellor, Rebecca
    Heales, Luke
    Nordez, Antoine
    Hug, Francois
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Coombes, Brooke K.
    Year published
    2018
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    We thank Zhang et al for their letter to the editor which raises the question as to whether insertional and non‐insertional (or mid‐portion) Achilles tendinopathy have different “stiffness patterns.” This proposal is based on findings of greater “hardness” in insertional Achilles tendinopathy in the study by Zhang et al,1 and lower “elastic modulus” in the study by Coombes et al,2 which recruited participants with a clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy at either region. While plausible, there are several critical differences between the two studies that ought to be considered.We thank Zhang et al for their letter to the editor which raises the question as to whether insertional and non‐insertional (or mid‐portion) Achilles tendinopathy have different “stiffness patterns.” This proposal is based on findings of greater “hardness” in insertional Achilles tendinopathy in the study by Zhang et al,1 and lower “elastic modulus” in the study by Coombes et al,2 which recruited participants with a clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy at either region. While plausible, there are several critical differences between the two studies that ought to be considered.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
    Volume
    28
    Issue
    10
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13265
    Copyright Statement
    © 2018 Blackwell Verlag GmbH. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Do insertional and mid‐portion Achilles tendinopathy display different material properties?, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, Volume 28, Issue 10, Pages 2247-2248, 2018 , which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13265. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving (http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-828039.html)
    Subject
    Sports science and exercise
    Medical physiology
    Science & Technology
    Life Sciences & Biomedicine
    Sport Sciences
    SHEAR-WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/387398
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E
    • TEQSA: PRV12076

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander