Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrassl, Marieke A
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, David P
dc.contributor.authorDenfeld, Blaize A
dc.contributor.authorde Eyto, Elvira
dc.contributor.authorHampton, Stephanie E
dc.contributor.authorKeller, Philipp S
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Sapna
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Abigail SL
dc.contributor.authorWeyhenmeyer, Gesa A
dc.contributor.authorO'Reilly, Catherine M
dc.contributor.authorLofton, Mary E
dc.contributor.authorCatalan, Nuria
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-20T03:29:22Z
dc.date.available2019-09-20T03:29:22Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1553-734X
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006508
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/387581
dc.description.abstractScience is increasingly done in large teams [1], making it more likely that papers will be written by several authors from different institutes, disciplines, and cultural backgrounds. A small number of “Ten simple rules” papers have been written on collaboration [2, 3] and on writing [4, 5] but not on combining the two. Collaborative writing with multiple authors has additional challenges, including varied levels of engagement of coauthors, provision of fair credit through authorship or acknowledgements, acceptance of a diversity of work styles, and the need for clear communication. Miscommunication, a lack of leadership, and inappropriate tools or writing approaches can lead to frustration, delay of publication, or even the termination of a project.
dc.description.sponsorshipIan Potter Foundation
dc.description.sponsorshipGriffith University
dc.description.sponsorshipCawthron Institute Trust Board
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Limited
dc.description.sponsorshipReef and Rainforest Research Centre
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversities Australia
dc.description.sponsorshipDept of Science, Information Technology, Innovation & the Arts (DSITIA)
dc.description.sponsorshipGriffith University
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library Science
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrome1006508:1
dc.relation.ispartofpagetoe1006508:8
dc.relation.ispartofissue11
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPLoS Computational Biology
dc.relation.ispartofvolume14
dc.relation.urihttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/DP190101848
dc.relation.grantIDDP190101848
dc.relation.fundersARC
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMathematical Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiological Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchInformation and Computing Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode01
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode06
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode08
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technology
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject.keywordsBiochemical Research Methods
dc.subject.keywordsMathematical & Computational Biology
dc.subject.keywordsBiochemistry & Molecular Biology
dc.titleTen simple rules for collaboratively writing a multi-authored paper
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC3 - Articles (Letter/ Note)
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFrassl, MA; Hamilton, DP; Denfeld, BA; de Eyto, E; Hampton, SE; Keller, PS; Sharma, S; Lewis, ASL; Weyhenmeyer, GA; O'Reilly, CM; Lofton, ME; Catalan, N, Ten simple rules for collaboratively writing a multi-authored paper, PLoS Computational Biology, 2018, 14 (11), pp. e1006508:1-e1006508:8
dcterms.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.date.updated2019-09-20T03:16:47Z
dc.description.versionVersion of Record (VoR)
gro.rights.copyright© 2018 Frassl et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorFrassl, Marieke A.
gro.griffith.authorHamilton, David P.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record