Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoteman, ÿrjanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Kipen_US
dc.contributor.authorDekker, Sidneyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T11:19:07Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T11:19:07Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.date.modified2011-05-30T06:54:43Z
dc.identifier.issn10508414en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10508410709336939en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/38850
dc.description.abstractThe operational community has assumed that using a head-up display (HUD) instead of conventional head-down displays will increase accuracy and safety during approach and landing. The putative mechanism for this increase in safety is that previously demonstrated improvements in lateral and vertical control of the aircraft in flight should carry over to the landing situation. Alternatively, it is possible that, during approach and landing, the HUD might affect the pilot's ability to assimilate outside cues at the decision height, thereby reducing the success ratio for landings using an HUD. This article reports a pair of experiments that test these competing hypotheses. Taking advantage of the opportunity when an air transport operator introduced HUD in an existing aircraft fleet, we were able to use a Boeing 737-700 full-motion simulator flown by commercial airline pilots.Weexplored the effects of (a)HUDuse, (b) ambient visibility, and (c) length of approach lighting on the size and location of the touchdown footprint. We also explored the effects of HUD use on approach success ratio.HUDuse reduced the width of the touchdown footprint in all tested visibility and lighting conditions, including visibility below the minimum allowed. HUD use had no effect on the length of the touchdown footprint. We could not detect any decrease in approach success rate for HUD approaches. Based on these empirical data, the minimum visibility for approaches using HUDs could be set lower than for approaches without an HUD.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom91en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto108en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalThe International Journal of Aviation Psychologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume17en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchFlight Dynamicsen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode090106en_US
dc.titleHUD With a Velocity (Flight-Path) Vector Reduces Lateral Error During Landing in Restricted Visibilityen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2007
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record