Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStenning, Philipen_US
dc.contributor.editorMargaret E. Beare and Tonita Murrayen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T11:19:13Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T11:19:13Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.date.modified2011-05-30T06:54:45Z
dc.identifier.isbn9780802091529en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/38851
dc.description.abstractThis chapter serves to clarify some of the key concepts. By graphically illustrating the relationship between degrees of 'control' and degrees of accountability it is argued that the two concepts are not incompatible. The term independence is then used in the chapter to refer only to decision-making that falls in what is pictured as the fourth quadrant: 'full accountability' with 'no control'. The chapter then outlines the scope or range of the potentially 'independent' decision-making tasks. Stenning discusses the growth of the 'doctrine of police independence'. It is argued that what we might assume is a widely held value favouring police independence is in fact unique to certain jurisdictions and the United Kingdom 'roots' to the Canadian police services are more questionable than many writers assume. The main task of this chapter was to present an international perspective. The chapter provides an overview of police independence in England and Wales, Australia and New Zealand. Regarding England and Wales, the chapter concludes that the scope and practical implications of police independence remain 'unclear and open to contestation and debate'. In Australia police independence tends to be limited by the way in which the Australian police services are organized-on a state and Commonwealth governmental level rather than having local or municipal forces. In New Zealand there is one single national police service and therefore no local authorities that could make demands or issue instructions to the police. The NZ police are governed directly by the central government. However, three recent factors have expanded the discussion in NZ regarding the issues that surround police-government relations: a governmental review of the administration and management of the New Zealand Police; controversy over the state visit of the President of China to NZ in 1999; and the introduction of a Bill to amend the existing Police Act.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherUniversity of Toronto Pressen_US
dc.publisher.placeTorontoen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/inquiries/ipperwash/policy_part/meetings/pdf/Stenning.pdfen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofbooktitlePolice and Government Relations: Who is calling the shots?en_US
dc.relation.ispartofchapter4en_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom183en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto255en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPolice Administration, Procedures and Practiceen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode160205en_US
dc.titleThe idea of the political 'independence' of the police: international interpretations and experiencesen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
dc.type.descriptionB1 - Book Chapters (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeB - Book Chaptersen_US
gro.date.issued2007
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Book chapters
    Contains book chapters authored by Griffith authors.

Show simple item record