Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreenslade, JH
dc.contributor.authorWallis, M
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, ANB
dc.contributor.authorCarlström, E
dc.contributor.authorWilhelms, DB
dc.contributor.authorCrilly, J
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-18T01:39:56Z
dc.date.available2019-10-18T01:39:56Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1472-0205en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/emermed-2018-208390en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/388525
dc.description.abstractBackground: The ED Stressor Scale outlines 15 stressors that are of importance for ED staff. Limited research has identified how commonly such stressors occur, or whether such factors are perceived with similar importance across different hospitals. This study sought to examine the frequency or perceived severity of these 15 stressors using a multicentre cohort of emergency clinicians (nurses and physicians) in EDs in two countries (Australia and Sweden). Method: This was a cross-sectional survey of staff working in eight hospitals in Australia and Sweden. Data were collected between July 2016 and June 2017 (depending on local site approvals) via a printed survey incorporating the 15-item ED stressor scale. The median stress score for each item and the frequency of experiencing each event was reported. Results: Events causing most distress include heavy workload, death or sexual abuse of a child, inability to provide optimum care and workplace violence. Stressors reported most frequently include dealing with high acuity patients, heavy workload and crowding. Violence, workload, inability to provide optimal care, poor professional relations, poor professional development and dealing with high-acuity patients were reported more commonly by Australian staff. Swedish respondents reported more frequent exposure to mass casualty incidents, crisis management and administrative concerns. Conclusions: Workload, inability to provide optimal care, workplace violence and death or sexual abuse of a child were consistently reported as the most distressing events across sites. The frequency with which these occurred differed in Australia and Sweden, likely due to differences in the healthcare systems.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishingen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEmergency Medicine Journalen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchNursingen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPublic Health and Health Servicesen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1103en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1110en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1117en_US
dc.subject.keywordspsychologyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsstaff supporten_US
dc.titleKey occupational stressors in the ED: An international comparisonen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articlesen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGreenslade, JH; Wallis, M; Johnston, ANB; Carlström, E; Wilhelms, DB; Crilly, J, Key occupational stressors in the ED: An international comparison, Emergency Medicine Journal, 2019en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-09-03
dc.date.updated2019-10-18T00:15:09Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorJohnston, Amy N.
gro.griffith.authorCrilly, Julia
gro.griffith.authorWallis, Marianne


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record