Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorW.A. Dekker, Sidneyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T11:19:04Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T11:19:04Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.date.modified2011-05-30T06:58:02Z
dc.identifier.issn14451433en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04253.xen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/38892
dc.description.abstractAs stakeholders struggle to reconcile calls for accountability and pressures for increased patient safety, criminal prosecution of surgeons and other health-care workers for medical error seems to be on the rise. This paper examines whether legal systems can meaningfully draw a line between acceptable performance and negligence. By questioning essentialist assumptions behind 'crime' or 'negligence', this paper suggests that multiple overlapping and partially contradictory descriptions of the same act are always possible, and even necessary, to approximate the complexity of reality. Although none of these descriptions is inherently right or wrong, each description of the act (as negligence, or system failure, or pedagogical issue) has a fixed repertoire of responses and countermeasures appended to it, which enables certain courses of action while excluding others. Simply holding practitioners accountable (e.g. by putting them on trial) excludes any beneficial effects as it produces defensive posturing, obfuscation and excessive stress and leads to defensive medicine, silent reporting systems and interference with professional oversight. Calls for accountability are important, but accountability should be seen as bringing information about needed improvements to levels or groups that can do something about it, rather than deflecting resources into legal protection and limiting liability. We must avoid a future in which we have to turn increasingly to legal systems to wring accountability out of practitioners because legal systems themselves have increasingly created a climate in which telling each other accounts openly is less and less possible.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Asiaen_US
dc.publisher.placeAustraliaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom831en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto837en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue10en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalANZ Journal of Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume77en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchHealth Information Systems (incl. Surveillance)en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode111711en_US
dc.titleCriminalization of medical error: who draws the line?en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2007
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record