Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcIntosh, Megan
dc.contributor.authorOpozda, Melissa J
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Holly
dc.contributor.authorFinlay, Amy
dc.contributor.authorGalvão, Daniel A
dc.contributor.authorChambers, Suzanne K
dc.contributor.authorShort, Camille E
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-07T03:54:14Z
dc.date.available2019-11-07T03:54:14Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1099-1611
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pon.5262
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/388968
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Understanding the unmet supportive care needs of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer may enable researchers and health professionals to better support men and prevent discontinuation when there is no evidence of disease progression. This review aimed to identify the specific unmet supportive care needs of men on active surveillance. METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Databases (Pubmed, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) were searched to identify qualitative and/or quantitative studies which reported unmet needs specific to men on active surveillance. Quality appraisals were conducted before results were narratively synthesised. RESULTS: Of the 3,613 unique records identified, only eight articles were eligible (five qualitative and three cross-sectional studies). Unmet Informational, Emotional/Psychological, Social, and 'Other' needs were identified. Only three studies had a primary aim of investigating unmet supportive care needs. Small active surveillance samples, use of non-validated measures, and minimal reporting of author reflexivity in qualitative studies were the main quality issues identified. CONCLUSIONS: The unmet needs of men on active surveillance is an under-researched area. Preliminary evidence suggests the information available and provided to men during active surveillance is perceived as inadequate and inconsistent. Men may also be experiencing unmet psychological/emotional, social, and other needs; however, further representative, high-quality research is required to understand the magnitude of this issue. Reporting results specific to treatment type and utilising relevant theories/models (such as the social ecological model) is recommended to ensure factors which may facilitate unmet needs are appropriately considered and reported.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPsycho-Oncology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchOncology and Carcinogenesis
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1112
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1103
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1701
dc.subject.keywordsactive surveillance
dc.subject.keywordssupportive care needs
dc.subject.keywordssystematic review
dc.subject.keywordsProstate cancer
dc.titleA systematic review of the unmet supportive care needs of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMcIntosh, M; Opozda, MJ; Evans, H; Finlay, A; Galvão, DA; Chambers, SK; Short, CE, A systematic review of the unmet supportive care needs of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer, Psycho-Oncology, 2019
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-10-14
dc.date.updated2019-11-06T23:23:07Z
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorChambers, Suzanne K.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record