Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNesbitt, Alexander Luke
dc.contributor.authorJoshi, Andre
dc.contributor.authorPerera, Marlon
dc.contributor.authorClubb, Adrian
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-02T02:21:00Z
dc.date.available2019-12-02T02:21:00Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1757-790X
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bcr-2019-232280
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/389423
dc.description.abstractUreteral stents are an essential tool in modern day adult and paediatric urology. They are usually placed with the intention of removal or replacement after a specific time but may occasionally be forgotten or unintentionally retained. We present the case of a young man who presented with symptoms caused by a retained ureteric stent placed 26 years earlier during reconstructive ureteric surgery as an infant.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherB M J Group
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrome232280: 1
dc.relation.ispartofpagetoe232280: 2
dc.relation.ispartofissue11
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBMJ Case Rep
dc.relation.ispartofvolume12
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1103
dc.subject.keywordspaediatric surgery
dc.subject.keywordsurological surgery
dc.titleRetained neonatal ureteral stent post-ureteric reimplantation: a 26-year saga
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC2 - Articles (Other)
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNesbitt, AL; Joshi, A; Perera, M; Clubb, A, Retained neonatal ureteral stent post-ureteric reimplantation: a 26-year saga., BMJ Case Rep, 2019, 12 (11), pp. e232280: 1-e232280: 2
dc.date.updated2019-11-27T00:31:15Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorNesbitt, Alexander L.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record