Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBorg, DN
dc.contributor.authorStewart, IB
dc.contributor.authorCostello, JT
dc.contributor.authorDrovandi, CC
dc.contributor.authorMinett, GM
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-02T06:50:48Z
dc.date.available2019-12-02T06:50:48Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0031-9384
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.06.026
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/389453
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study examined the effect of environmental temperature deception on the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) during 30 min of fixed-intensity cycling in the heat. Methods: Eleven trained male cyclists completed an incremental cycling test and four experimental trials. Trials consisted of 30 min cycling at 50% Pmax, once in 24 °C (CON) and three times in 33 °C. In the hot trials, parti-cipants were provided with accurate temperature feedback (HOT), or were deceived to believe the temperature was 28 °C (DECLOW) or 38 °C (DECHIGH). During cycling, RPE was recorded every 5 min. Rectal and skin tem-perature, heart rate and oxygen uptake were continuously measured. Data were analysed using linear mixed model methods in a Bayesian framework, magnitude-based inferences (Cohens d), and the probability that d exceeded the smallest worthwhile change. Results: RPE was higher in the heat compared to CON, but not statistically different between the hot conditions (mean [95% credible interval]; DECLOW: 13.0 [11.9, 14.1]; HOT: 13.0 [11.9, 14.1]; DECHIGH: 13.1 [12.0, 14.2]). Heart rate was significantly higher in DECHIGH (141 b·min−1 [132, 149]) compared to all other conditions (DECLOW: 138 b·min−1 [129, 146]; HOT: 138 b·min−1 [129, 145]) after 10 min; however, this did not alter RPE. All other physiological variables did not differ between the hot conditions. Conclusion: Participants were under the impression they were cycling in different environments; however, this did not influence RPE. These data suggest that for trained cyclists, an awareness of environmental temperature does not contribute to the generation of RPE when exercising at a fixed intensity in the heat.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom333
dc.relation.ispartofpageto340
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPhysiology & Behavior
dc.relation.ispartofvolume194
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiological sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiomedical and clinical sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSports science and exercise
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode31
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode32
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4207
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode52
dc.titleThe impact of environmental temperature deception on perceived exertion during fixed-intensity exercise in the heat in trained-cyclists
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBorg, DN; Stewart, IB; Costello, JT; Drovandi, CC; Minett, GM, The impact of environmental temperature deception on perceived exertion during fixed-intensity exercise in the heat in trained-cyclists, Physiology & Behavior, 2018, 194, pp. 333-340
dcterms.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.date.updated2019-11-29T04:54:21Z
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscript (AM)
gro.rights.copyright© 2018 Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, providing that the work is properly cited.
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorBorg, David


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record