Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEllis, Cath
dc.contributor.authorvan Haeringen, Karen
dc.contributor.authorHarper, Rowena
dc.contributor.authorBretag, Tracey
dc.contributor.authorZucker, Ian
dc.contributor.authorMcBride, Scott
dc.contributor.authorRozenberg, Pearl
dc.contributor.authorNewton, Phil
dc.contributor.authorSaddiqui, Sonia
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T02:32:12Z
dc.date.available2019-12-06T02:32:12Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0729-4360
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/07294360.2019.1680956
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/389577
dc.description.abstractContract cheating occurs when a student outsources their assessment to a third party, regardless of the third party’s relationship with the student, or whether money is exchanged. In higher education, there is a widespread belief that assessment design is a solution to the problem of contract cheating and that authentic assessment tasks are particularly effective. This research analysed two datasets – 221 assignment orders placed on academic custom writing websites and 198 assessment tasks in which contract cheating was detected – to investigate if authentic assessment can assure academic integrity. The authenticity of assessments was determined using five factors derived from the literature: frequency, fidelity, complexity, real-world impact and feed forward. Our analysis found that assessment tasks with no, some, or all of the five authenticity factors are routinely outsourced by students.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Education and Training
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherInforma UK Limited
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1
dc.relation.ispartofpageto16
dc.relation.ispartofjournalHigher Education Research & Development
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSpecialist Studies in Education
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEducation
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1303
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode13
dc.titleDoes authentic assessment assure academic integrity? Evidence from contract cheating data
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEllis, C; van Haeringen, K; Harper, R; Bretag, T; Zucker, I; McBride, S; Rozenberg, P; Newton, P; Saddiqui, S, Does authentic assessment assure academic integrity? Evidence from contract cheating data, Higher Education Research & Development, pp. 1-16
dc.date.updated2019-12-06T01:50:41Z
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorvan Haeringen, Karen A.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record