Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBretag, Tracey
dc.contributor.authorHarper, Rowena
dc.contributor.authorRundle, Kiata
dc.contributor.authorNewton, Philip M
dc.contributor.authorEllis, Cath
dc.contributor.authorSaddiqui, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorvan Haeringen, Karen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T02:34:23Z
dc.date.available2019-12-06T02:34:23Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0260-2938
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02602938.2019.1614146
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/389578
dc.description.abstractThis article reports on one aspect of a nationally funded research project on contract cheating in Australian higher education. The project explored students' and educators’ experiences of contract cheating, and the contextual factors that may influence it. This article reports the key findings from non-university higher education providers (NUHEPs). It compares survey responses from 961 students and 91 educators at four NUHEPs with previously reported findings from eight universities (14,086 students and 1,147 staff). NUHEP and university students report engaging in contract cheating in similar ways. However, while NUHEP educators spend more time teaching academic literacies and discussing contract cheating, NUHEP students are 12 times more likely than university students to report use of a professional academic writing service. Both NUHEP and university educators require systematic professional development regarding the relationship between the teaching and learning environment and students’ contract cheating behaviour. NUHEPs need to be cognisant of students’ vulnerability to commercial contract cheating services, and ensure they have access to timely academic and social support.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Education and Training
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherInforma UK Limited
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1
dc.relation.ispartofpageto15
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSpecialist Studies in Education
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEducation
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1303
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode13
dc.titleContract cheating in Australian higher education: a comparison of non-university higher education providers and universities
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBretag, T; Harper, R; Rundle, K; Newton, PM; Ellis, C; Saddiqui, S; van Haeringen, K, Contract cheating in Australian higher education: a comparison of non-university higher education providers and universities, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, pp. 1-15
dc.date.updated2019-12-06T01:50:57Z
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorvan Haeringen, Karen A.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record