Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPaynter, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorLuskin-Saxby, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorKeen, Deb
dc.contributor.authorFordyce, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorFrost, Grace
dc.contributor.authorImms, Christine
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Scott
dc.contributor.authorSutherland, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorTrembath, David
dc.contributor.authorTucker, Madonna
dc.contributor.authorEcker, Ullrich
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T00:23:37Z
dc.date.available2020-01-09T00:23:37Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0162-3257
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10803-019-04332-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/389786
dc.description.abstractUse of empirically unsupported practices is a challenge in the field of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We explored whether attitudes and perceived evidence were linked to intended practice use in early intervention staff. Seventy-one participants completed ratings of the evidence base, current and future use of six ASD intervention practices, and reported attitudes to research and evidence-based practice. Participants reported greater use and rated the evidence base higher for the empirically supported practices. However, variability in accuracy of evidence base ratings was observed across individuals. Higher perceived evidence was linked to greater future use intentions for empirically supported and unsupported practices. The need for accurate information across practice types is highlighted. Self-report methodology limitations and future research directions are discussed.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSpringer New York
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology and Cognitive Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEducation
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode17
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode13
dc.subject.keywordsAutism spectrum disorder
dc.subject.keywordsDebunking
dc.subject.keywordsEvidence-based practice
dc.subject.keywordsKnowledge translation
dc.subject.keywordsMisinformation
dc.titleBrief Report: Perceived Evidence and Use of Autism Intervention Strategies in Early Intervention Providers
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPaynter, J; Luskin-Saxby, S; Keen, D; Fordyce, K; Frost, G; Imms, C; Miller, S; Sutherland, R; Trembath, D; Tucker, M; Ecker, U, Brief Report: Perceived Evidence and Use of Autism Intervention Strategies in Early Intervention Providers., Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2019
dc.date.updated2019-12-13T03:57:49Z
dc.description.versionPost-print
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version.
gro.rights.copyright© 2019 Springer US. This is an electronic version of an article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders is available online at: http://link.springer.com/ with the open URL of your article.
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorTrembath, David
gro.griffith.authorPaynter, Jessica M.
gro.griffith.authorLuskin-Saxby, Sarah
gro.griffith.authorKeen, Deb A.
gro.griffith.authorSutherland, Rebecca D.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record