Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPeterie, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorBielefeld, Shelley
dc.contributor.authorMarston, Greg
dc.contributor.authorMendes, Philip
dc.contributor.authorHumpage, Louise
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-18T03:39:20Z
dc.date.available2019-12-18T03:39:20Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0157-6321
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ajs4.79
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/389835
dc.description.abstractCompulsory Income Management (CIM) is a form of conditional welfare that involves the mandatory quarantining of a portion of welfare recipients’ social security payments. Quarantined funds are accessible via a government‐issued debit card, with restrictions surrounding where and on what funds can be spent. Official justifications of CIM have framed these policies as attempts to combat substance abuse and gambling problems, and to thus secure better outcomes for welfare recipients and their families. Central to this narrative has been the argument that welfare quarantining will ensure more money is spent on ‘essentials’, including accommodation. No existing studies, however, have specifically interrogated the impacts of CIM on housing security. This article responds to this gap in the literature by reviewing existing research concerning CIM's impacts and locating this research within broader debates regarding the causes of homelessness and the efficacy of individualised policy interventions. In doing so, it highlights CIM's potential to exacerbate housing insecurity not only through technical issues such as rental transfer failures, but also by contributing to underlying stressors such as economic disadvantage; relationship difficulties, poor health and addiction; and social stigma. The article concludes that – far from addressing the structural causes of homelessness – CIM has enflamed them.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.publisher.placeAustralia
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAustralian Journal of Social Issues
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSociology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchStudies in Human Society
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1608
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode16
dc.titleCompulsory income management: Combatting or compounding the underlying causes of homelessness?
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPeterie, M; Bielefeld, S; Marston, G; Mendes, P; Humpage, L, Compulsory income management: Combatting or compounding the underlying causes of homelessness?, Australian Journal of Social Issues, 2019
dc.date.updated2019-12-17T04:06:31Z
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorBielefeld, Shelley S.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record