• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Theses
    • Theses - Higher Degree by Research
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Theses
    • Theses - Higher Degree by Research
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Rejection Sensitivity and Internalising Symptoms in Youth: A Focus on Parenting and Self-Regulation

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Gardner, Alex_Final Thesis_redacted.pdf (1.099Mb)
    Author(s)
    Gardner, Alex A.
    Primary Supervisor
    Zimmer-Gembeck, Melanie
    Other Supervisors
    Modecki, Kathryn
    Year published
    2019-11
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    There is abundant evidence supporting the importance of accepting and autonomy-supportive parenting rather than rejecting and autonomy-restrictive or controlling parenting for development. This is especially relevant for adolescent and young adult (youth) adaptive development, including the development of relational schemas, coping skills and emotional health. Moreover, the impact of the quality of parent-child (and other) relationships on youth’s emotional health has been described as mediated via relational schemas, with schemas defined as beliefs, biases, and expectations that arise out of social experiences. For example, ...
    View more >
    There is abundant evidence supporting the importance of accepting and autonomy-supportive parenting rather than rejecting and autonomy-restrictive or controlling parenting for development. This is especially relevant for adolescent and young adult (youth) adaptive development, including the development of relational schemas, coping skills and emotional health. Moreover, the impact of the quality of parent-child (and other) relationships on youth’s emotional health has been described as mediated via relational schemas, with schemas defined as beliefs, biases, and expectations that arise out of social experiences. For example, rejection sensitivity (RS) theory (Downey & Feldman, 1996) is one influential perspective that explicitly identifies how social experiences of rejection, victimisation, or isolation gives rise to a cognitive-affective bias of anxious expectation, biased perceptions, and defensive overreactions to ambiguous or overt cues of rejection. These cognitive affective biases in turn, are implicated in the development and maintenance of negative outcomes, such as internalising symptoms. However, components of this model, when applied to older adolescents and young adults, have rarely examined the mechanisms that help account for the associations of parental experiences, RS, and internalising symptoms. To this end, the aim of the four empirical studies conducted for this thesis was to apply the RS framework to test a model that specifically accounts for how interpersonal experiences (in the form of parenting behaviours), biased perceptions and beliefs regarding interpersonal exchanges (i.e., RS), and intrapersonal vulnerabilities (i.e., maladaptive socio-emotional responses) all play roles in elevated internalising symptoms for older adolescents and young adults. A parallel aim was to identify protective factors (i.e., cognitive reappraisal and coping flexibility) that may modify the risk of these interpersonal and intrapersonal factors for older adolescents and young adults. To achieve these aims, the four studies utilized either cross-sectional or two waves of longitudinal data collected from older adolescents and young adults over a 1-year period. Study 1 tested a comprehensive RS-model among a sample of 628 older adolescents and young adults. Structural equation models (SEMs) were used to identify serial-mediation pathways of risk stemming from parenting practices and RS onto higher depressive and anxious symptoms. Study 2 examined the temporal risk that RS plays for increased internalising symptoms over a one-year time span via heightened emotional dysregulation, expressive suppression, and social avoidance among 402 longitudinal participants from Study 1. Further, in Study 2, bi-directional relations between socio-emotional responses and internalising symptoms were tested, with results supporting bi-directional associations over time. Study 3 drew upon the cross-sectional sample from Study 1 (N = 643) to examine the moderating effects of three related, but distinct, components of the self-perceived capacity for flexibly coping with stress (i.e., multiple coping strategy use, situational coping, and coping rigidity). More specifically, these three capacities were examined as potential moderators of the relations between several regulatory strategies (emotion dysregulation, suppression, social avoidance, and cognitive reappraisal) and internalising symptoms. Finally, making use of the longitudinal sample, Study 4 (N = 394) examined the moderating effects of cognitive reappraisal and coping flexibility (i.e., multiple coping strategy use) on the concurrent and temporal associations of parenting, RS, and internalising symptoms over a 1-year period. Altogether, three general conclusions from these studies are described. First, though parenting practices are correlates of youths’ internalising symptoms, it is RS that is the most salient risk of symptoms over time. Second, emotional dysregulation, suppression, and social avoidance are key mechanisms that independently confer risk for more elevated symptoms and partially account for the increased risk of elevated perceptions of RS and greater symptoms over time. Additionally, cognitive reppraisal played a unique and buffering role in cross-sectional associations. Third, coping flexibility appears to be an important resource for youth, but further research is needed to examine the interplay of flexible coping capacities with parenting, ER, ways of coping, and internalising symptoms among youth. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed, along with recommendations for future research. Taken together, the current research identifies multiple interpersonal and intrapersonal risk and protective factors that are relevant for understanding increases in internalising symptomology during late adolescence and young adulthood. Furthermore, these factors, in particular, could be targeted as avenues for intervention to help youth cope with interpersonal stressors of rejecting and autonomy-restrictive parenting and RS.
    View less >
    Thesis Type
    Thesis (Professional Doctorate)
    Degree Program
    Doctor of Philosophy in Clinical Psychology (PhD ClinPsych)
    School
    School of Applied Psychology
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/1562
    Copyright Statement
    The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise.
    Subject
    autonomy-supportive parenting
    autonomy-restrictive parenting
    rejecting
    controlling
    parenting practices
    sensitivity
    youth
    rejection sensitivity
    internalising symptoms
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/390065
    Collection
    • Theses - Higher Degree by Research

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander