• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Reports
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Reports
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • 2015-03: Institutional investors and newly public firms (Working paper)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Discussion paper (400.1Kb)
    Author(s)
    Neupane, Suman
    Neupane, Biwesh
    Thapa, Chandra
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Neupane, Suman
    Year published
    2015
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Using data from the Indian market, this study compares the investment behavior of domestic (DIIs) and foreign (FIIs) institutional investors in IPOs. We find that while FIIs subscribe to more shares at the time of the offering, DIIs' subscription appears to be more measured and as a result their subscription subsumes that of FIIs in explaining listing returns. In the immediate post-listing period, FIIs reduce their IPO holdings more deeply than DIIs and they do this more in cold than hot IPOs. FIIs adjust their portfolios in the post-IPO period by reducing their holdings in smaller and younger firms, i.e. firms with high ...
    View more >
    Using data from the Indian market, this study compares the investment behavior of domestic (DIIs) and foreign (FIIs) institutional investors in IPOs. We find that while FIIs subscribe to more shares at the time of the offering, DIIs' subscription appears to be more measured and as a result their subscription subsumes that of FIIs in explaining listing returns. In the immediate post-listing period, FIIs reduce their IPO holdings more deeply than DIIs and they do this more in cold than hot IPOs. FIIs adjust their portfolios in the post-IPO period by reducing their holdings in smaller and younger firms, i.e. firms with high stock volatility, and increasing their holdings in stock with higher returns. Overall, our results show that the behavior of FIIs in Indian IPOs is consistent with the view of investors chasing hot markets with hot money.
    View less >
    Copyright Statement
    Copyright © 2010 by author(s). No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form, or stored in a retrieval system, without prior permission of the author(s).
    Note
    Finance
    Subject
    G15 - International Financial Markets
    G24 - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage; Ratings and Ratings Agencies
    Institutional Investors
    Domestic Institutional investors
    Foreign Institutional Investors
    Indian IPOs
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/390358
    Collection
    • Reports

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E
    • TEQSA: PRV12076

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander