2014-02: The geographic spillover of armed conflict in sub-Saharan Africa (Working paper)

View/ Open
Author(s)
Carmignani, Fabrizio
Kler, Parvinder
Year published
2014
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Anecdotal accounts of the geographical spread of war inevitably involve Sub-Sahara African countries. But is the conflict spillover effect effectively stronger in Sub-Saharan Africa than elsewhere? To answer this question, we specify a dynamic spatial panel model and estimate it for two separate samples: the group of all Sub-Saharan Africa countries and a group of other emerging and developing economies. It turns out that the conflict spillover is stronger and more persistent over time in the latter. However, when attention is restricted to civil wars, the contemporaneous spillover effect is stronger in Sub-Saharan Africa. ...
View more >Anecdotal accounts of the geographical spread of war inevitably involve Sub-Sahara African countries. But is the conflict spillover effect effectively stronger in Sub-Saharan Africa than elsewhere? To answer this question, we specify a dynamic spatial panel model and estimate it for two separate samples: the group of all Sub-Saharan Africa countries and a group of other emerging and developing economies. It turns out that the conflict spillover is stronger and more persistent over time in the latter. However, when attention is restricted to civil wars, the contemporaneous spillover effect is stronger in Sub-Saharan Africa. One extra year of war in the neighbourhood of a generic Sub-Saharan African country in a given decade results in about three more weeks of war in that country in the same decade. This spillover effect is significantly stronger for civil wars than it is for interstate wars. However, the effect is halved after one decade. We argue that even if not quantitatively large, policymakers should not understate its importance and intervene to prevent possible regional escalation of violence.
View less >
View more >Anecdotal accounts of the geographical spread of war inevitably involve Sub-Sahara African countries. But is the conflict spillover effect effectively stronger in Sub-Saharan Africa than elsewhere? To answer this question, we specify a dynamic spatial panel model and estimate it for two separate samples: the group of all Sub-Saharan Africa countries and a group of other emerging and developing economies. It turns out that the conflict spillover is stronger and more persistent over time in the latter. However, when attention is restricted to civil wars, the contemporaneous spillover effect is stronger in Sub-Saharan Africa. One extra year of war in the neighbourhood of a generic Sub-Saharan African country in a given decade results in about three more weeks of war in that country in the same decade. This spillover effect is significantly stronger for civil wars than it is for interstate wars. However, the effect is halved after one decade. We argue that even if not quantitatively large, policymakers should not understate its importance and intervene to prevent possible regional escalation of violence.
View less >
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2010 by author(s). No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form, or stored in a retrieval system, without prior permission of the author(s).
Note
Economics and Business Statistics
Subject
D74 - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances
C23 - Single Equation Models; Single Variables: Models with Panel Data; Longitudinal Data; Spatial Time Series
N47 - Economic History: Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation: Africa; Oceania