2016-06: Spill over effects of executive incentives on corporate cash holdings: Evidence from Australia (Working paper)

View/ Open
Author(s)
Atif, Muhammad
Liu, Benjamin
Huang, Allen
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2016
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We examine the effects of chief executive officer (CEO) compensation incentives on cash holdings in Australia, augmented with Remuneration Act 2011, to better understand how the regulatory changes affect the incentives to align the interest of shareholders and managers. We use sample of top 300 ASX listed firms over the period from 2004-2015 (3600 observations). We find a negative relationship of equity incentives with cash holding after the promulgation of new regulatory change on compensation. We also find that the negative effect of regulatory changes is robust after controlling for corporate governance mechanism. In a ...
View more >We examine the effects of chief executive officer (CEO) compensation incentives on cash holdings in Australia, augmented with Remuneration Act 2011, to better understand how the regulatory changes affect the incentives to align the interest of shareholders and managers. We use sample of top 300 ASX listed firms over the period from 2004-2015 (3600 observations). We find a negative relationship of equity incentives with cash holding after the promulgation of new regulatory change on compensation. We also find that the negative effect of regulatory changes is robust after controlling for corporate governance mechanism. In a finer analysis, we document that the negative relationship makes the managers incapable to extract rent in the presence of governance mechanism and independent remuneration committee. Furthermore, our evidence supports the precautionary motive of cash holding.
View less >
View more >We examine the effects of chief executive officer (CEO) compensation incentives on cash holdings in Australia, augmented with Remuneration Act 2011, to better understand how the regulatory changes affect the incentives to align the interest of shareholders and managers. We use sample of top 300 ASX listed firms over the period from 2004-2015 (3600 observations). We find a negative relationship of equity incentives with cash holding after the promulgation of new regulatory change on compensation. We also find that the negative effect of regulatory changes is robust after controlling for corporate governance mechanism. In a finer analysis, we document that the negative relationship makes the managers incapable to extract rent in the presence of governance mechanism and independent remuneration committee. Furthermore, our evidence supports the precautionary motive of cash holding.
View less >
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2010 by author(s). No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form, or stored in a retrieval system, without prior permission of the author(s).
Note
Finance
Subject
G30 - Corporate Finance and Governance: General
G32 - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure
G34 - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Voting; Proxy Contests; Corporate Governance
G38 - Corporate Finance and Governance: Government Policy and Regulation
Cash holding
Australia
compensation
corporate governance