Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorScanlan, Justin Newton
dc.contributor.authorLogan, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorArblaster, Karen
dc.contributor.authorHaracz, Kirsti
dc.contributor.authorFossey, Ellie
dc.contributor.authorMilbourn, Benjamin Tyler
dc.contributor.authorPepin, Genevieve
dc.contributor.authorMachingura, Tawanda
dc.contributor.authorWebster, Jayne S
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Amy
dc.contributor.authorHancock, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Heidi
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, Desley
dc.contributor.authorWalder, Kim
dc.contributor.authorWillcourt, Ellice
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Anne
dc.contributor.authorWright, Shelley
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-16T03:14:28Z
dc.date.available2020-01-16T03:14:28Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0045-0766
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1440-1630.12634
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/390515
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Recovery‐oriented practice policies and occupational therapy education accreditation standards require that consumers are engaged in the design, delivery and evaluation of curricula. This consumer involvement (sometimes referred to as service‐user involvement or patient involvement in other contexts) should go beyond consumers simply ‘telling their stories’ to more meaningful collaboration in curricula. This study was designed to map the current patterns of consumer involvement in occupational therapy programs across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. Method: A survey was distributed to all occupational therapy programs across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. The survey included questions related to: (a) perceived enablers and barriers to consumer involvement in education; (b) organisational structures and support; (c) ways in which consumer are involved in the design, delivery and evaluation of curricula; (d) access to remuneration for consumers; (e) overall ratings of the level of consumer involvement in curricula; and (f) academic confidence in working with consumers. Results: Usable responses were received for 23 programs from 19 universities (83% response rate). Every program reported some consumer involvement in the curriculum. Consumer participation tended to be mainly focussed on curriculum delivery with less frequent involvement in curriculum design or evaluation. The most common barrier to consumer involvement in curricula was ‘funding/remuneration for consumers’ and the most common enabler of consumer involvement was ‘positive attitudes of teaching staff’. Conclusion: In comparison to previous reports, consumer involvement in occupational therapy curricula has increased over the past decade. However, ongoing effort is required to support true collaboration in all aspects of curriculum design, delivery and evaluation. While this will require attention and effort from academic teams, changes at a university level to establish systems to engage and effectively remunerate consumers for their involvement (especially in design and evaluation elements) are also required.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.publisher.placeAustralia
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAustralian Occupational Therapy Journal
dc.subject.fieldofresearchHealth sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCurriculum and pedagogy
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMedicine, nursing and health curriculum and pedagogy
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode42
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode3901
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode390110
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technology
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject.keywordsRehabilitation
dc.subject.keywordsco-design
dc.subject.keywordsconsumer
dc.titleMental health consumer involvement in occupational therapy education in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationScanlan, JN; Logan, A; Arblaster, K; Haracz, K; Fossey, E; Milbourn, BT; Pepin, G; Machingura, T; Webster, JS; Baker, A; Hancock, N; Miller, H; Simpson, D; Walder, K; Willcourt, E; Williams, A; Wright, S, Mental health consumer involvement in occupational therapy education in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand, Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 2019
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-11-12
dc.date.updated2020-01-16T00:27:36Z
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version.
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorMachingura, Tawanda
gro.griffith.authorWalder, Kim A.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record