Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSuetani, Shuichi
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Justin
dc.contributor.authorKorman, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Carly
dc.contributor.authorDodd, Cassandra
dc.contributor.authorDark, Frances
dc.contributor.authorParker, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorSiskind, Dan
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-16T23:14:27Z
dc.date.available2020-01-16T23:14:27Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1039-8562
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1039856219881957
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/390554
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To compare the acceptability of three distinct physical activity measurement tools in people with psychosis: an objective measurement tool, a self-report measure, and an exercise capacity test. METHODS: We measured the completion rate for each measurement tool. Participants rated the ease/difficulty of each measure using a 7-point Likert scale. Participants were also asked to rank the three tools in order of the ease of use. RESULTS: Sixty-six per cent (46/69) of participants completed all three assessment tools, and 60.9% (42/69) completed the acceptability questionnaire. The majority of the participants found it easy to complete all three measurement tools. The majority (52.8%) of the participants ranked the objective measurement tool as the easiest to use. CONCLUSION: All three measures were acceptable to people with psychosis, but objective measurement tools may be easier to use.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAustralasian Psychiatry
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMedical and Health Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology and Cognitive Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1701
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode11
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode17
dc.subject.keywordsQUESTIONNAIRES
dc.subject.keywordsMETAANALYSIS
dc.subject.keywordsFEASIBILITY
dc.subject.keywordsADULTS
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technology
dc.titleA comparison study of three physical activity measurement tools examining acceptability in people with psychosis
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSuetani, S; Chapman, J; Korman, N; Chapman, C; Dodd, C; Dark, F; Parker, S; Siskind, D, A comparison study of three physical activity measurement tools examining acceptability in people with psychosis, Australasian Psychiatry, 2019
dc.date.updated2020-01-16T22:23:27Z
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorSuetani, Shuichi


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record