Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNorman, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorPickering, Catherine Marina
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-17T02:57:00Z
dc.date.available2020-01-17T02:57:00Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0143-6228
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.01.014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/390581
dc.description.abstractThe following abstract was missing from the original version of the above-mentioned article: “The emergence of web platforms where people share geographic data provides a new way to monitor how people use landscapes. This includes assessing park use, including for different recreational activities such as walking and running: but which platforms are best to use and why? To start to address these questions we compared geographic route data for park visitors from three large web share platforms: GPSies, MapMyFitness and Wikiloc. We obtained route data from all three platforms for an urban park (Daisy Hill), a peri-urban park (Lamington) and a more remote park (Mount Barney) in Australia. The largest number of user posted routes for the three parks was from MapMyFitness (1041 routes), including information on how walkers (572) and runners (469) use trails, particularly in Daisy Hill (705). However, the popularity of this platform is declining. In contrast, Wikiloc provided information on off track use, particularly in the more remote Mount Barney National Park. There were few trails on GPSies from the three parks, despite the platform’s popularity in Europe. The results indicate that the best platform to use will depend on the questions asked and the popularity of the platform with local users. Volunteered geographic data can be a cost and time efficient way to collect visitor data compared to some other methods, such as trail counters and observations, but it only reflects particular users, and is geographically and temporally variable as the popularity of platforms change among users.” The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience that this may have caused to the readers. DOI of the original article: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.11.001
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom168
dc.relation.ispartofpageto168
dc.relation.ispartofjournalApplied Geography
dc.relation.ispartofvolume91
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPhysical Geography and Environmental Geoscience
dc.subject.fieldofresearchHuman Geography
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode0406
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1604
dc.subject.keywordsSocial Sciences
dc.subject.keywordsGeography
dc.titleCorrigendum to “Using volunteered geographic information to assess park visitation: Comparing three on-line platforms” [Applied Geography 89C (2017) 163-72]
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC3 - Articles (Letter/ Note)
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNorman, P; Pickering, CM, Using volunteered geographic information to assess park visitation: Comparing three on-line platforms (vol 89C, pg 163, 2017), Applied Geography, 2018, 91, pp. 168-168
dc.date.updated2020-01-17T02:55:16Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorNorman, Patrick
gro.griffith.authorPickering, Catherine M.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record