dc.contributor.author | Chan, Dara V | |
dc.contributor.author | Thorpe, Deborah E | |
dc.contributor.author | Trost, Stewart G | |
dc.contributor.author | Boyd, Roslyn N | |
dc.contributor.author | Faldowski, Richard A | |
dc.contributor.author | Barber, Lee | |
dc.contributor.author | Levin, Ilana | |
dc.contributor.author | Carroll, Amanda | |
dc.contributor.author | Bagatell, Nancy | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-20T23:15:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-20T23:15:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0963-8288 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/09638288.2019.1577500 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/390652 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: Rehabilitation goals often focus on increasing community integration for adults with disabilities and are measured by objective assessments. Research methods have lagged behind in capturing current conceptualizations of community integration as a multidimensional construct that incorporates participation, social supports, and feelings of belonging in the community. This paper addresses this challenge by describing a multi-method approach to assessing community integration for adults with cerebral palsy.
Methods: Measures include standardized questionnaires, qualitative methods, measures of function and physical activity, and geospatial measures using Geographic Information System mapping and Global Positioning System tracking. These objective and subjective data are used to determine where adults spend time and are most active, and which activities and social connections are associated with feeling integrated into the community.
Results: Two case examples highlight the importance of using a multi-method approach to assess community integration for adults with cerebral palsy. Results of objective clinical measures were comparable among case examples; however, actual experiences of feeling connected to the community were vastly different.
Conclusions: Multiple measures are required to capture the complexity of community integration. Relying solely on objective measures may not provide a complete picture of community integration. | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Yes | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Disability and Rehabilitation | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Biomedical and clinical sciences | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Clinical sciences | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 32 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 3202 | |
dc.subject.keywords | Science & Technology | |
dc.subject.keywords | Life Sciences & Biomedicine | |
dc.subject.keywords | Rehabilitation | |
dc.subject.keywords | Community integration | |
dc.subject.keywords | adults | |
dc.title | Novel approaches to measuring community integration in adults with cerebral palsy | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.type.description | C1 - Articles | |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Chan, DV; Thorpe, DE; Trost, SG; Boyd, RN; Faldowski, RA; Barber, L; Levin, I; Carroll, A; Bagatell, N, Novel approaches to measuring community integration in adults with cerebral palsy, Disability and Rehabilitation, 2019 | |
dc.date.updated | 2020-01-20T00:43:38Z | |
gro.description.notepublic | This publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version. | |
gro.hasfulltext | No Full Text | |
gro.griffith.author | Barber, Lee A. | |