Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCulyer, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorChalkidou, Kalipso
dc.contributor.authorTeerawattananon, Yot
dc.contributor.authorSantatiwongchai, Benjarin
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-04T01:18:40Z
dc.date.available2020-02-04T01:18:40Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2046-1402
dc.identifier.doi10.12688/f1000research.13284.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/391091
dc.description.abstractThere seems to be a general agreement amongst practitioners of economic evaluations, including Health Technology Assessment, that the explicit statement of a perspective is a necessary element in designing and reporting research. Moreover, there seems also to be a general presumption that the ideal perspective is "societal". In this paper we endorse the first principle but dissent from the second. A review of recommended perspectives is presented. The societal perspective is frequently not the one recommended. The societal perspective is shown to be less comprehensive than is commonly supposed, is inappropriate in many contexts and, in any case, is in general not a perspective to be determined independently of the context of a decision problem. Moreover, the selection of a perspective, societal or otherwise, is not the prerogative of analysts.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFaculty of 1000
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom72:1
dc.relation.ispartofpageto72:19
dc.relation.ispartofjournalF1000Res
dc.relation.ispartofvolume7
dc.subject.fieldofresearchApplied Economics
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPublic Health and Health Services
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiochemistry and Cell Biology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchOncology and Carcinogenesis
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1402
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1117
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode0601
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1103
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1112
dc.subject.keywordsCEA
dc.subject.keywordsHTA
dc.subject.keywordspatients’ preferences.
dc.subject.keywordsperspective
dc.subject.keywordsreference case
dc.titleRival perspectives in health technology assessment and other economic evaluations for investing in global and national health. Who decides? Who pays?
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCulyer, A; Chalkidou, K; Teerawattananon, Y; Santatiwongchai, B, Rival perspectives in health technology assessment and other economic evaluations for investing in global and national health. Who decides? Who pays?, F1000Res, 2018, 7, pp. 72:1-72:19
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-01-04
dcterms.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.date.updated2020-02-04T01:12:32Z
dc.description.versionVersion of Record (VoR)
gro.rights.copyright© 2018 Culyer A et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorChalkidou, Kalipso


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record