Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFreudenberg, Brett
dc.contributor.authorBoccabella, Dale
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-06T23:33:20Z
dc.date.available2020-02-06T23:33:20Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0311-094X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/391150
dc.description.abstractIn 2011, the provisions providing for allocation to beneficiaries of a trust’s franked distributions and associated tax attributes (franking credit tax offsets) were amended in light of the High Court decision in Commissioner of Taxation v Bamford. The concern from Bamford was that streaming of receipts of a discretionary trust may no longer be available in light of the proportionate view interpretation of the rule that allocates the trust’s taxable income to beneficiaries. The overwhelming aim of the 2011 amendments was to cement the streaming of a trust’s franked distributions and associated tax attributes (and net capital gains) to selected beneficiaries to the exclusion of other entitled beneficiaries. However, the amended provisions prevent streaming of franking credits where the distribution is extinguished by related expenses. However, the old provisions, as confirmed in the recent Thomas v Federal Commissioner of Taxation decisions, permitted streaming in these situations.
dc.publisherThomson Reuters
dc.publisher.urihttp://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/category/journals/australian-tax-review/
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom190
dc.relation.ispartofpageto218
dc.relation.ispartofissue3
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAustralian Tax Review
dc.relation.ispartofvolume48
dc.subject.fieldofresearchApplied Economics
dc.subject.fieldofresearchAccounting, Auditing and Accountability
dc.subject.fieldofresearchLaw
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1402
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1501
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1801
dc.titleStreaming of Franking Credits Curtailed by Bamford-Induced Amendments - An Unintended Consequence?
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFreudenberg, B; Boccabella, D, Streaming of Franking Credits Curtailed by Bamford-Induced Amendments - An Unintended Consequence?, Australian Tax Review, 2019, 48 (3), pp. 190-218
dc.date.updated2020-02-05T01:42:38Z
dc.description.versionPublished
gro.rights.copyright© 2019 Thomson Reuters. This article was first published by Thomson Reuters in the Australian Tax Review and should be cited as Brett Freudenberg et al., Streaming of Franking Credits Curtailed by Bamford-Induced Amendments - An Unintended Consequence?, (2019) 48 AT Rev 190. For all subscription inquiries please phone, from Australia: 1300 304 195, from Overseas: +61 2 8587 7980 or online at legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/search. The official PDF version of this article can also be purchased separately from Thomson Reuters at http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/subscribe-or-purchase.
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorFreudenberg, Brett D.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record