Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDanby, Meaghan C
dc.contributor.authorSharman, Stefanie J
dc.contributor.authorBrubacher, Sonja P
dc.contributor.authorPowell, Martine B
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Kim P
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-13T03:38:27Z
dc.date.available2020-02-13T03:38:27Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1068-316X
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1068316X.2017.1324028
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/391385
dc.description.abstractThe ability to describe individual episodes of repeated events (such as ongoing abuse) can enhance children’s testimony and assist the progression of their cases through the legal system. Open-ended prompts have been advocated as a means to assist children in accurately retrieving information about individual episodes. In the current study, two subtypes of open-ended prompts (cued and general invitations) were compared for their effects on five- to nine-year-olds’ (n = 203) reports about individual episodes of a repeated event. Interviews occurred 1–2 weeks after the last of 4 event sessions. Cued invitations assisted children to provide specific details about individual episodes of a repeated event, while general invitations were useful to elicit more broad happenings of the episodes. The accuracy of responses to general invitations was similar for children of all ages up to one week after the event, but at a longer interview delay younger children were less accurate than older children. There were no differences in the accuracy of responses to cued invitations as a function of age or interview delay. Results suggest that interviewers tasked with eliciting accounts of individual episodes from a repeated event, such as ongoing abuse, should consider the differential efficacy of each prompt-type on children’s reports.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom794
dc.relation.ispartofpageto811
dc.relation.ispartofissue8
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPsychology, Crime & Law
dc.relation.ispartofvolume23
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCriminology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4402
dc.subject.keywordsSocial Sciences
dc.subject.keywordsCriminology & Penology
dc.subject.keywordsPsychology, Multidisciplinary
dc.subject.keywordsGovernment & Law
dc.titleDifferential effects of general versus cued invitations on children's reports of a repeated event episode
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDanby, MC; Sharman, SJ; Brubacher, SP; Powell, MB; Roberts, KP, Differential effects of general versus cued invitations on children's reports of a repeated event episode, Psychology, Crime & Law, 2017, 23 (8), pp. 794-811
dc.date.updated2020-02-13T00:54:16Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorPowell, Martine B.
gro.griffith.authorBrubacher, Sonja


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record