Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMacQuilkan, Kim
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Peter
dc.contributor.authorDowney, Laura
dc.contributor.authorRuiz, Francis
dc.contributor.authorChalkidou, Kalipso
dc.contributor.authorPrinja, Shankar
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Kun
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorGlassman, Amanda
dc.contributor.authorHofman, Karen
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-14T05:07:25Z
dc.date.available2020-02-14T05:07:25Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1654-9880en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/16549716.2018.1527556en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/391515
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Resource allocation in health is universally challenging, but especially so in resource-constrained contexts in the Global South. Pursuing a strategy of evidence-based decision-making and using tools such as Health Technology Assessment (HTA), can help address issues relating to both affordability and equity when allocating resources. Three BRICS and Global South countries, China, India and South Africa have committed to strengthening HTA capacity and developing their domestic HTA systems, with the goal of getting evidence translated into policy. Through assessing and comparing the HTA journey of each country it may be possible to identify common problems and shareable insights. OBJECTIVES: This collaborative paper aimed to share knowledge on strengthening HTA systems to enable enhanced evidence-based decision-making in the Global South by: Identifying common barriers and enablers in three BRICS countries in the Global South; and Exploring how South-South collaboration can strengthen HTA capacity and utilisation for better healthcare decision-making. METHODS: A descriptive and explorative comparative analysis was conducted comprising a Within-Case analysis to produce a narrative of the HTA journey in each country and an Across-Case analysis to explore both knowledge that could be shared and any potential knowledge gaps. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that China, India and South Africa share many barriers to strengthening and developing HTA systems such as: (1) Minimal HTA expertise; (2) Weak health data infrastructure; (3) Rising healthcare costs; (4) Fragmented healthcare systems; and (5) Significant growth in non-communicable diseases. Stakeholder engagement and institutionalisation of HTA were identified as two conducive factors for strengthening HTA systems. CONCLUSION: China, India and South Africa have all committed to establishing robust HTA systems to inform evidence-based priority setting and have experienced similar challenges. Engagement among countries of the Global South can provide a supportive platform to share knowledge that is more applicable and pragmatic.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1527556:1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto1527556:13en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalGlobal Health Actionen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume11en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPublic Health and Health Servicesen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1117en_US
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technologyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicineen_US
dc.subject.keywordsPublic, Environmental & Occupational Healthen_US
dc.subject.keywordsCapacity buildingen_US
dc.subject.keywordssouth-south collaborationen_US
dc.titleStrengthening health technology assessment systems in the global south: a comparative analysis of the HTA journeys of China, India and South Africaen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articlesen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMacQuilkan, K; Baker, P; Downey, L; Ruiz, F; Chalkidou, K; Prinja, S; Zhao, K; Wilkinson, T; Glassman, A; Hofman, K, Strengthening health technology assessment systems in the global south: a comparative analysis of the HTA journeys of China, India and South Africa, Global Health Action, 2018, 11 (1), pp. 1527556:1-1527556:13en_US
dcterms.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.date.updated2020-02-14T05:03:39Z
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
gro.rights.copyright© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorChalkidou, Kalipso


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record