Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaum, Fran
dc.contributor.authorGraycar, Adam
dc.contributor.authorDelany-Crowe, Toni
dc.contributor.authorde Leeuw, Evelyne
dc.contributor.authorBacchi, Carol
dc.contributor.authorPopay, Jennie
dc.contributor.authorOrchard, Lionel
dc.contributor.authorColebatch, Hal
dc.contributor.authorFriel, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorMacDougall, Colin
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorLawless, Angela
dc.contributor.authorMcDermott, Dennis
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Matthew
dc.contributor.authoret al.
dc.description.abstractThere is strong, and growing, evidence documenting health inequities across the world. However, most governments do not prioritize policies to encourage action on the social determinants of health and health equity. Furthermore, despite evidence concerning the benefits of joined-up, intersectoral policy to promote health and health equity, it is rare for such policy approaches to be applied systematically. To examine the usefulness of political and social science theory in understanding the reasons for this disjuncture between evidence and practice, researchers and public servants gathered in Adelaide for an Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia (ASSA) Workshop. This paper draws together the learnings that emerged from the Workshop, including key messages about the usefulness of various theories as well as insights drawn from policy practice. Discussions during the Workshop highlighted that applying multiple theories is particularly helpful in directing attention to, and understanding, the influence of all stages of the policy process; from the construction and framing of policy problems, to the implementation of policy and evaluation of outcomes, including those outcomes that may be unintended. In addition, the Workshop emphasized the value of collaborations among public health researchers, political and social scientists and public servants to open up critical discussion about the intersections between theory, research evidence and practice. Such critique is vital to render visible the processes through which particular sources of knowledge may be privileged over others and to examine how political and bureaucratic environments shape policy proposals and implementation action.
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.ispartofjournalHealth Promotion International
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPublic Health and Health Services
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCurriculum and Pedagogy
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technology
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject.keywordsHealth Policy & Services
dc.subject.keywordsPublic, Environmental & Occupational Health
dc.subject.keywordsHealth Care Sciences & Services
dc.titleUnderstanding Australian policies on public health using social and political science theories: reflections from an Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia Workshop
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBaum, F; Graycar, A; Delany-Crowe, T; de Leeuw, E; Bacchi, C; Popay, J; Orchard, L; Colebatch, H; Friel, S; MacDougall, C; Harris, E; Lawless, A; McDermott, D; Fisher, M; et al., Understanding Australian policies on public health using social and political science theories: reflections from an Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia Workshop, Health Promotion International, 2019, 34 (4), pp. 833-846
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorGraycar, Adam

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record