Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChopra, V
dc.contributor.authorKaatz, S
dc.contributor.authorGrant, P
dc.contributor.authorSwaminathan, L
dc.contributor.authorBoldenow, T
dc.contributor.authorConlon, A
dc.contributor.authorBernstein, SJ
dc.contributor.authorFlanders, SA
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-09T06:05:54Z
dc.date.available2020-03-09T06:05:54Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0002-9343
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.01.017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/392209
dc.description.abstractBackground: Catheter exchange over a guidewire is frequently performed for malfunctioning peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Whether such exchanges are associated with venous thromboembolism is not known. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study to assess the association between PICC exchange and risk of thromboembolism. Adult hospitalized patients that received a PICC during clinical care at one of 51 hospitals participating in the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety consortium were included. The primary outcome was hazard of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (radiographically confirmed upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) in those that underwent PICC exchange vs those that did not. Results: Of 23,010 patients that underwent PICC insertion in the study, 589 patients (2.6%) experienced a PICC exchange. Almost half of all exchanges were performed for catheter dislodgement or occlusion. A total of 480 patients (2.1%) experienced PICC-associated deep vein thrombosis. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis was greater in those that underwent PICC exchange vs those that did not (3.6% vs 2.0%, P <.001). Median time to thrombosis was shorter among those that underwent exchange vs those that did not (5 vs 11 days, P =.02). Following adjustment, PICC exchange was independently associated with twofold greater risk of thrombosis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-2.85) vs no exchange. The effect size of PICC exchange on thrombosis was second in magnitude to device lumens (HR 2.06; 95% CI, 1.59-2.66 and HR 2.31; 95% CI, 1.6-3.33 for double- and triple-lumen devices, respectively). Conclusion: Guidewire exchange of PICCs may be associated with increased risk of thrombosis. As some exchanges may be preventable, consideration of risks and benefits of exchanges in clinical practice is needed.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom651
dc.relation.ispartofpageto660
dc.relation.ispartofissue6
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAmerican Journal of Medicine
dc.relation.ispartofvolume131
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMedical and Health Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode11
dc.subject.keywordsCentral venous catheter
dc.subject.keywordsDeep vein thrombosis
dc.subject.keywordsExchange
dc.subject.keywordsPICC
dc.subject.keywordsPeripherally inserted central catheter
dc.titleRisk of Venous Thromboembolism Following Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Exchange: An Analysis of 23,000 Hospitalized Patients
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationChopra, V; Kaatz, S; Grant, P; Swaminathan, L; Boldenow, T; Conlon, A; Bernstein, SJ; Flanders, SA, Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Following Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Exchange: An Analysis of 23,000 Hospitalized Patients, American Journal of Medicine, 2018, 131 (6), pp. 651-660
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-01-08
dc.date.updated2020-03-09T06:05:04Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorChopra, Vineet


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record