Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRaynor, Katrina Eve
dc.contributor.authorDoyon, Andréanne
dc.contributor.authorBeer, Tanja
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-14T01:27:31Z
dc.date.available2020-04-14T01:27:31Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0729-3682
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/07293682.2018.1477812
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/393049
dc.description.abstractThe challenges facing planning researchers and practitioners are increasingly complex and difficult to predict, model and control. Concurrently, participatory approaches to planning continue to be embedded in legal requirements, community expectations and in normative goals based on democracy and participation. In this context, there is a need to create planning processes that are responsive, adaptable and participatory. Despite this, urban planning is often criticised for reproducing existing inequalities and following path-dependent trajectories. This paper presents three approaches to participatory decision-making and planning; collaborative planning, a well-known planning tradition influenced by Habermasian ideal-speech concepts; transitions management, derived from sustainability transitions literature and; design thinking, derived from design disciplines. These approaches share a focus on stakeholder engagement and decision making in complex situations but are characterised by substantially different methodologies, theoretical groundings, priorities, goals and attitudes towards consensus and experimentation. Collaborative planning retains the greatest focus on power and representativeness, transitions management provides a complexity-informed normative focus on sustainable futures and design thinking provides a tangible and solutions-focused suite of tools designed for testing and implementing change. In this paper we present all three approaches, discussing their practical implications and theoretical insights.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Group
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom215
dc.relation.ispartofpageto224
dc.relation.ispartofissue4
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAustralian Planner
dc.relation.ispartofvolume54
dc.subject.fieldofresearchUrban and Regional Planning
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEnvironmental Science and Management
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1205
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode0502
dc.titleCollaborative planning, transitions management and design thinking: evaluating three participatory approaches to urban planning
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRaynor, KE; Doyon, A; Beer, T, Collaborative planning, transitions management and design thinking: evaluating three participatory approaches to urban planning, Australian Planner, 2017, 54 (4), pp. 215-224
dc.date.updated2020-04-13T23:36:56Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorBeer, Tanja


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record