Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorConigrave, James H
dc.contributor.authorLee, KS Kylie
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Scott
dc.contributor.authorPerry, Jimmy
dc.contributor.authorChikritzhs, Tanya
dc.contributor.authorSlade, Tim
dc.contributor.authorMorley, Kirsten
dc.contributor.authorRoom, Robin
dc.contributor.authorCallinan, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorHayman, Noel
dc.contributor.authorConigrave, Katherine M
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aims: To reduce health and social inequities, it is important to understand how drinking patterns vary within and between Indigenous peoples. We aimed to assess variability in estimates of Indigenous Australian drinking patterns and to identify demographic and methodological factors associated with this. Design: A three-level meta-analysis of Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (‘Indigenous’) drinking patterns [International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) no. CRD42018103209]. Setting: Australia. Participants: Indigenous Australians. Measurements: The primary outcomes extracted were drinking status, single-occasion risk and life-time risk. Moderation analysis was performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. Moderators included gender, age, socio-economic status, local alcohol restrictions, sample population, remoteness, Australian state or territory, publication year, Indigenous involvement in survey design or delivery and cultural adaptations. Findings: A systematic review of the literature revealed 41 eligible studies. For all primary outcomes, considerable heterogeneity was identified within ((Formula presented.) = 51.39–68.80%) and between ((Formula presented.) = 29.27–47.36%) samples. The pooled proportions (P) of current drinkers [P = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.53–0.65], single-occasion (P = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.24–0.44) and life-time (P = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.15–0.29) risk were all moderated by gender, age, remoteness and measurement tool. Reference period moderated proportions of participants at single-occasion risk. Conclusions: Indigenous Australian drinking patterns vary within and between communities. Initiatives to reduce high-risk drinking should take account of this variability.
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiomedical and clinical sciences
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technology
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject.keywordsSubstance Abuse
dc.titleDrinking risk varies within and between Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander samples: a meta-analysis to identify sources of heterogeneity
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationConigrave, JH; Lee, KSK; Zheng, C; Wilson, S; Perry, J; Chikritzhs, T; Slade, T; Morley, K; Room, R; Callinan, S; Hayman, N; Conigrave, KM, Drinking risk varies within and between Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander samples: a meta-analysis to identify sources of heterogeneity, Addiction, 2020
gro.description.notepublicThis publication was entered as an advanced online version.
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorHayman, Noel E.

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record