Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNg, WL
dc.contributor.authorCollins, PF
dc.contributor.authorHickling, DF
dc.contributor.authorBell, JJ
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-12T02:58:34Z
dc.date.available2020-05-12T02:58:34Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0261-5614
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clnu.2018.10.025
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/393796
dc.description.abstractBackground: Nutrition screening and assessment tools often include body mass index (BMI) as a component in identifying malnutrition risk. However, rising obesity levels will impact on the relevancy and applicability of BMI cut-off points which may require re-evaluation. This study aimed to explore the relationship between commonly applied BMI cut-offs and diagnosed malnutrition. Methods: Data (age, gender, BMI and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) ratings) were analysed for 1152 inpatients aged ≥65 years across annual malnutrition audits (2011–2015). The receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve analysed the optimal BMI cut-off for malnutrition and concurrent validity of commonly applied BMI cut-offs in nutritional screening and assessment tools. Results: Malnutrition prevalence was 36.0% (n = 372) using SGA criteria (not malnourished, moderate or severe malnutrition). Median age was 78.7 (IQR 72–85) years, median BMI 25.4 (IQR 21.8–29.7) kg/m2; 52.1% male and 51.2% overweight/obese. ROC analysis identified an optimal BMI cut-off of <26 kg/m2, 80.8% sensitivity and 61.5% specificity (AUC 0.802, 95% CI 0.773, 0.830; p < 0.0001). Commonly applied BMI cut-offs (between 18.5 and 23 kg/m2) failed to meet the alpha-priori requirement of 80% sensitivity and 60% specificity. However, BMI <23 kg/m2 had the highest agreement (κ = 0.458) with malnutrition diagnosed using the SGA. Conclusions: Both malnutrition and overweight/obesity are common in older inpatients. Continuing increases in the prevalence of overweight and obesity will impact on the sensitivity of BMI as a screening component for malnutrition risk. The current study suggests tools developed over a decade ago may need to be revisited in future.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom2417
dc.relation.ispartofpageto2422
dc.relation.ispartofissue5
dc.relation.ispartofjournalClinical Nutrition
dc.relation.ispartofvolume38
dc.subject.fieldofresearchNutrition and Dietetics
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1111
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technology
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject.keywordsBody mass index
dc.subject.keywordsMalnutrition
dc.titleEvaluating the concurrent validity of body mass index (BMI) in the identification of malnutrition in older hospital inpatients
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNg, WL; Collins, PF; Hickling, DF; Bell, JJ, Evaluating the concurrent validity of body mass index (BMI) in the identification of malnutrition in older hospital inpatients, Clinical Nutrition, 2019, 38 (5), pp. 2417-2422
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-10-31
dc.date.updated2020-05-12T02:54:18Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorCollins, Peter


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record