Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Brett G
dc.contributor.authorShaban, Ramon Z
dc.contributor.authorMacBeth, Deborough
dc.contributor.authorRusso, Philp
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-20T23:46:02Z
dc.date.available2020-05-20T23:46:02Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2468-0451en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.idh.2019.06.004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/394084
dc.description.abstractBackground: Individuals in residential and aged care facilities (RACFs) are at risk of developing health care-associated infections (HAIs) due to factors such as age-related changes in physiology, immunity, comorbid illness and functional disability. The recent establishment of an Australian Royal Commission into the Quality of Residential and Aged Care Services highlights the challenges of providing care in this sector. This national study identified infection prevention and control (IPC) services, practice and priorities in Australian RACFs. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 158 Australian RACFs comprising a 42-question survey incorporating five key domains relating to IPC namely governance, education, practice, surveillance, competency and capability was undertaken in 2018. Results: Of the 131 respondents, the majority 92.4% of respondents reported having a documented IPC program, 22.9% (n = 30) operated with a dedicated infection control committee The majority of RACFs reported lacking specialist and qualified experienced IPC professionals (n = 67). The majority of RACFs (90.1%, n = 118) reported the existence of a designated employee with IPC responsibilities. Of these 118 staff members with IPC responsibilities, 42.5% had a qualification in IPC. The reported average funded hours per month for IPC professional or an external provider of IPC activities was 14 (95% CI 9.6–18.9 h). Conclusion: The overwhelming majority of RACFs deliver IPC services and report doing so in ways that meet the needs of their own specific contexts in the absence of the lack of formal guidelines when compared to the hospital sector. Quality residential and aged care free from HAIs requires formal structure and organization strategies.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom187en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto193en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue4en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInfection, Disease & Healthen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume24en_US
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technologyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicineen_US
dc.subject.keywordsPublic, Environmental & Occupational Healthen_US
dc.subject.keywordsInfection controlen_US
dc.subject.keywordsNursing homesen_US
dc.titleOrganisation and governance of infection prevention and control in Australian residential aged care facilities: A national surveyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articlesen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMitchell, BG; Shaban, RZ; MacBeth, D; Russo, P, Organisation and governance of infection prevention and control in Australian residential aged care facilities: A national survey, Infection, Disease & Health, 2019, 24 (4), pp. 187-193en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-06-11
dc.date.updated2020-05-20T23:43:52Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorShaban, Ramon Z.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record