Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUgalde, Anna
dc.contributor.authorBlaschke, Sarah-May
dc.contributor.authorSchofield, Penelope
dc.contributor.authorLambert, Sylvie D
dc.contributor.authorAranda, Sanchia
dc.contributor.authorBoltong, Anna
dc.contributor.authorChambers, Suzanne K
dc.contributor.authorKrishnasamy, Meinir
dc.contributor.authorLivingston, Patricia
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-28T23:58:34Z
dc.date.available2020-05-28T23:58:34Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1057-9249
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pon.5404
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/394210
dc.description.abstractInformal caregivers are important in supporting people with cancer due to the ageing population, improvements in diagnosis and treatment, and a shift towards home-based cancer care.[1, 2] The ageing of the population, improvements in diagnosis and treatment and the shift towards home-based cancer care places significant burden on informal caregivers. Caregivers frequently experience several negative impacts associated with the care provision including psychological and physical morbidity.[3-5] These negative impacts have informed several intervention studies aiming to improve caregiver outcomes.[6-8] The body of intervention research is diverse; for example, there is a lack of consensus on how to define caregivers,[9] leading to a significant variance in samples between studies. Interventions can also range in type, dose, format, and content [6], as well as their focus with noted categories including psychoeducational, skills training or therapeutic counselling.[7] Similarly, the range of outcomes studied and reported has also been broad, spanning categories such as quality of life, emotional support, communication and relational intimacy, and caregiving tasks.[6] Furthermore, some studies explore patient outcomes in the context of the type of caregiving they receive.[10] Overall, there have been a range of approaches trialled involving different groups, aiming to improve health outcomes.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPsycho-Oncology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchOncology and carcinogenesis
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode3202
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode3211
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode52
dc.titlePriorities for cancer caregiver intervention research: A three-round modified Delphi study to inform priorities for Participants, Interventions, Outcomes and Study Design Characteristics
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC3 - Articles (Letter/ Note)
dcterms.bibliographicCitationUgalde, A; Blaschke, S-M; Schofield, P; Lambert, SD; Aranda, S; Boltong, A; Chambers, SK; Krishnasamy, M; Livingston, P, Priorities for cancer caregiver intervention research: A three-round modified Delphi study to inform priorities for Participants, Interventions, Outcomes and Study Design Characteristics., Psycho-Oncology, 2020
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-04-28
dc.date.updated2020-05-28T00:55:34Z
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscript (AM)
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version.
gro.rights.copyright© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Priorities for cancer caregiver intervention research: A three‐round modified Delphi study to inform priorities for Participants, Interventions, Outcomes and Study Design Characteristics, Psycho-Oncology, Accepted Article, which has been published in final form at 10.1002/pon.5404. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving (http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-828039.html)
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorChambers, Suzanne K.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record