Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPaterson, Rebecca S
dc.contributor.authorChopra, Vineet
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Erin
dc.contributor.authorKleidon, Tricia M
dc.contributor.authorCooke, Marie
dc.contributor.authorRickard, Claire M
dc.contributor.authorBernstein, Steven J
dc.contributor.authorUllman, Amanda J
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T23:34:13Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T23:34:13Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0031-4005
dc.identifier.doi10.1542/peds.2019-3474H
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/394667
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To critically review the evidence for the selection and insertion of pediatric vascular access devices (VADs). DATA SOURCES: Data were sourced from the US National Library of Medicine, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, the Cochrane Library databases, Embase, and international clinical trial databases. STUDY SELECTION: Clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews, cohort designs, randomized control trials (RCTs), quasi RCTs, before-after trials, or case-control studies that reported on complications and/or risk as well as reliability of VADs in patients aged 0 to 18 years were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Articles were independently reviewed to extract and summarize details on the number of patients and catheters, population, age of participants, VAD type, study method, indication, comparators, and the frequency of VAD failure or complications. RESULTS: VAD selection and insertion decision-making in general hospitalized and some specialized patient populations were well evidenced. The use of single-lumen devices and ultrasound-guided techniques was also broadly supported. There was a lack of RCTs, and for neonates, cardiac patients, patients with difficult venous access, midline catheters, catheter-to-vein ratio, and near-infrared devices, the lack of evidence necessitated broadening the review scope. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the lack of formal assessment of the quality of evidence and the lack of RCTs and systematic reviews. Consequently, clinical decision-making in certain pediatric populations is not guided by strong, evidence-based recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first synthesis of available evidence for the selection and insertion of VADs in pediatric patients and is important for determining the appropriateness of VADs in pediatric patients.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
dc.relation.ispartofpagefromS243
dc.relation.ispartofpagetoS268
dc.relation.ispartofissueSuppl 3
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPediatrics
dc.relation.ispartofvolume145
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiomedical and clinical sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode32
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode3202
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode52
dc.titleSelection and Insertion of Vascular Access Devices in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPaterson, RS; Chopra, V; Brown, E; Kleidon, TM; Cooke, M; Rickard, CM; Bernstein, SJ; Ullman, AJ, Selection and Insertion of Vascular Access Devices in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review., Pediatrics, 2020, 145 (Suppl 3), pp. S243-S268
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-01-21
dc.date.updated2020-06-16T03:17:57Z
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscript (AM)
gro.rights.copyright© 2020 American Academy of Pediatrics. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal website for access to the definitive, published version.
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorCooke, Marie L.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record